Again. www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1127016...nificant-person.html

Firstly, what the heck is "untouchable"? Nobody is untouchable, and the idea that the CPS and goodness knows who else have banded together to protect a paedophile is ludicrous.

But, if we give him the benefit of the doubt and it is happening, he MUST tell us exactly who is colluding in harming children, or he is responsible too!

Interesting, i wonder who he has in he's sights now.
Could Yewtree II be around the corner 10 years on? Hope not.

Guess MWT wants another "trophy" to his many achievements.

He has already started a frenzy of wild guesses on twitter, which undoubtedly will bring in false accusations too.

If the police are dodgy (as a few are) and fiddle with the evidence to get convictions (as has happened) it will be "good old MWT".

If everything is above board and the CPS tells them to get evidence or get lost, "good old MWT" will say that they are protecting untouchables, and be seen as a hero. (by the brainless)

Meanwhile, there could be victims who are scared to seek help because people like Mark Williams Thomas encourage the idea of important people being untouchable, and MIGHT BE making it come true by keeping his mouth shut. (on the off chance he really does know something)

I suspect that the only thing that is actually untouchable is this man's monstrous ego!

So just who is this so called untouchable predator? Lol
I mean it's only minor celebs who get questioned about this stuff right?
Savile...a z list DJ
Michael Jackson a has been one hit wonder.
Rolfaroo some painter who never even interacted with anyone remotely famous.
Bill Cosby a black guy who was held back by racists and hardly got any air time on racists American telivision.
R Kelly another x-factor reject.
Gary Glitter. A 70s Butlins act.
Pete Townshend. A busker
And some others nobody ever heard of right?

I'm assuming from what MWT the 3 DECADES veteran police officer is hinting is that it's some royal....and therefore untouchable.

Cos of course Prince Andrew and his exploits have been totally hushed up by media worldwide ain't they just?

My money is on it being that bloke who was on Blind Date in the 80s who could do a Rigsby impression. Gotta be!!

Donald Biden wrote:
So just who is this so called untouchable predator? Lol
I mean it's only minor celebs who get questioned about this stuff right?
Savile...a z list DJ
Michael Jackson a has been one hit wonder.
Rolfaroo some painter who never even interacted with anyone remotely famous.
Bill Cosby a black guy who was held back by racists and hardly got any air time on racists American telivision.
R Kelly another x-factor reject.
Gary Glitter. A 70s Butlins act.
Pete Townshend. A busker
And some others nobody ever heard of right?

I'm assuming from what MWT the 3 DECADES veteran police officer is hinting is that it's some royal....and therefore untouchable.

Cos of course Prince Andrew and his exploits have been totally hushed up by media worldwide ain't they just?

My money is on it being that bloke who was on Blind Date in the 80s who could do a Rigsby impression. Gotta be!!

I haven't laughed so much in ages. 🤣 😂

That's just awful. It does sound as if he's drumming up accusations.

Reminds me of this (forgive me for quoting an old post of mine!):

...

He said this in a 2015 BBC radio 5 live interview and it raises questions about his approach:

"If we can ta*... if we can prosecute or have prosecuted the most untouchable, then everybody is fair game."

audioboom.com/posts/2867220-mark-william...p;utm_source=twitter [recording no longer available]

* pronounced "tah" as in "target"

Surely it is a basic premise of justice in a democracy that you don't target people first and then look for evidence.

Suggest you move over to the Mad Mark thread to get more on this...

The Mad Mark thread doesn't include Honey's link to the Mail article.

I'm always puzzled about why, if a visitor starts a thread on a subject that interests you, JK, you often start another thread, instead of replying to the original thread and keeping everything together.

It's usually because threads have a tendency to go off the road started. And indeed because some links no longer apply. Also often I've written a comment and haven't put it up when someone starts a similar but different thread which might require editing, which I don't like to do.