IMPORTANT NOTE: You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.
|
Home Forums |
TOPIC: COVID and the A-Z jab
|
|
COVID and the A-Z jab 1 Year, 1 Month ago
|
|
I'm a fan of vaccines. Have taken the flu jab for 20 years - I've still got flu a couple of times (once when a different strain arrived) but each time it's been a mild 24 hours, not the usual 4-5 days. I go for my 6th Covid jab next week. But I insist it's Pfizer - or Moderna - NOT A-Z.
This is because it was revealed (before my first jab) that A-Z had not been tested on anybody over 60.
Since we are (and were) the main vulnerable group, I found this frightening.
Even more so as I believed (and still do) that the Covid panic had been inflated by the media (better story) and followed by stupid governments (except Sweden) and stupid experts as a "killer plague" for everyone and not as a new variant of Coronavirus, harmless to most (like flu) but lethal to certain groups (the elderly).
The result in that "believing the media" was panic and a rush to find a vaccine without due diligence. It was more important to be FIRST than to be safe.
One problem is nobody seemed to look at the variant properly (especially Long Covid - not easily examined when it was so new).
Another was not testing it on the vulnerable. Rushing it through to gain brownie points for stupid Governments and stupid Experts (none more stupid, nor more media controlled, than the UK).
We now find the A-Z Oxford vaccine has been killing people!
www.kingofhits.co.uk/component/option,co...,64/?g2_itemId=14905
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Re:COVID and the A-Z jab 1 Year, 1 Month ago
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Re:COVID and the A-Z jab 1 Year, 1 Month ago
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Re:COVID and the A-Z jab 1 Year, 1 Month ago
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Re:COVID and the A-Z jab 1 Year, 1 Month ago
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Re:COVID and the A-Z jab 3 Months, 1 Week ago
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Re:COVID and the A-Z jab 3 Months, 1 Week ago
|
|
Green Man wrote:
Wyot wrote:
It never made any sense.
Why not just test the workers in social care weekly who don't wish to take the vaccine? Lot cheaper than losing 40 000 plus health care staff.
And even then, vaccines protect those who contract Covid from the most severe effects, rather than particularly limit the spread.
God knows what it was all about - but it wasn't healthcare.
You know that logical thinking is dangerous Wyot. People will think you are a "right wing loon conspiracy theorist". That what Hedda called me, turned out I was right though. So I get the last laugh!
We agreed on the over reaction for sure GM but I don't agree with the anti-vax stuff.
Vaccinations are great for mankind and until I see any credible proof there was a plot behind vaccinations I will assume all of that is bollocks.
Though I do think perhaps the covid vax was rushed through, and there are risks in that.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|