cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Go to bottomPost New TopicPost Reply
TOPIC: Starmer's hardness
#248495
hedda

Starmer's hardness 1 Week, 6 Days ago  
I think the UK voted in what will turn out to be Britain's nastiest PM who has already proclaimed that Labour is "for the working class" (ie those with a job) when the British PM and whatever party is in power is bloody well voted in to serve every British citizen no matter their class or situation..

His latest statements that those who are disabled, sick should "look for a job" are a scary indication that Labour will crack down hard on those with long term illness yet because of the Tories decimation of the beloved NHS started by the ghastly Tony Blair care for the ill has become a complicated mess..some statistics are..

6.39m are awaiting hospital appointments.

2.8m are chronically ill.

endless statistics prove that the run down NHS is badly failing the ill.

..there are a host of reasons the genuinely ill are dying because of the inadequacies of the once venerated NHS.

Oz is so lucky (and so am I) with it's Medicare based on the NHS but with not a single part privatized and no politician of any stripe daring to, it hums along beautifully.

Not only do I get such superb treatment at no cost at point of use, I'm often supplied with Taxi cards to get to difficult areas of need.
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
#248503
Wyot

Re:Starmer's hardness 1 Week, 6 Days ago  
hedda wrote:
I think the UK voted in what will turn out to be Britain's nastiest PM

I fear you are correct Hedda.

So interesting how much more you can detect about someone when they get to PM. The lens of scrutiny is so tight.

He does come across to me as thin-skinned (disastrous for a PM), unpleasant, far too serious (about himself) and dare I say not particularly bright...
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
#248504
Downing Street Cat

Re:Starmer's hardness 1 Week, 6 Days ago  
Starmer---the unenviable. Not only as dull as ditch water but pretty damned unpleasant too. And for God's sake I wish he'd blow his nose.
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
#248934
Peter

Re:Starmer's hardness 4 Days, 3 Hours ago  
Some people are describing Starmer as the other cheek of the same backside. I'd say he's worse than that, he's the very same arse cheek of that same backside, not the other one of the same arse.

I voted Labour in July. The biggest mistake I ever made at the ballot box. Keir Starmer needs to go NOW
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
#248935
Green Man

Re:Starmer's hardness 4 Days, 3 Hours ago  
He promised us he will smash the gangs. 970 odd came over the yesterday on 17 boats. It must have looked like a Regatta race yesterday.
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
#248951
hedda

Re:Starmer's hardness 3 Days, 10 Hours ago  
Supporters of Free Gear Keith are pointing out the freebies he received are nothing like those various Tories have received but really it just shows Starmer & Labour can be bought for much less than the Conservatives.
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
#248974
Green Man

Re:Starmer's hardness 3 Days, 3 Hours ago  
Peter wrote:
Some people are describing Starmer as the other cheek of the same backside. I'd say he's worse than that, he's the very same arse cheek of that same backside, not the other one of the same arse.

I voted Labour in July. The biggest mistake I ever made at the ballot box. Keir Starmer needs to go NOW


Many people on social media are regretting their tick for Labour.
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
#248984
Rich

Re:Starmer's hardness 2 Days, 23 Hours ago  
Green Man wrote:
He promised us he will smash the gangs. 970 odd came over the yesterday on 17 boats. It must have looked like a Regatta race yesterday.

It's a gigantic failure of statecraft isn't it. These are large village population numbers appearing illegally each day. At that rate per day it would take just over a thousand days to reach a million people. Less than 3 years. Absolutely shameful. I wonder how different the approach to this would have been under a Labour Government in the 1970's if it had happened under Wilson or Callaghan. I even think Tony Blair would have got a big grip in the late 90's or early 00's.

Has the UK political class got a death wish? Just what is their real game here? What was it during 2018-19 that started this off in the first place, under let's not forget a Tory government led by the hapless Theresa May, plus Johnson. The English Channel and rubber dinghies have always existed long before just five or six years ago.

The Poles managed to put a stop to Belarus trying to bring people to the border and push them across into Poland a couple of years back, on a land border, yet the island nation UK can't manage ours. Rubbish. Nothing is impossible when there is determination and the willpower to do it.
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
#248987
Downing Street Cat

Re:Starmer's hardness 2 Days, 20 Hours ago  
We have no leaders. A very dangerous phase for humanity. I doubt Thatcher or Reagan would be overseeing the current shit storm in the Middle East. They"d have sorted them out. Biden Starmer Putin Nuttyyahu. Biden and Starmer pussyfoot about...Putin and Nuttyyahu take full advantage. Strength has gone AWOL. We are left with stammering and stuttering sweaty statements from very weak men. The world deserves and desperately needs much better. Ffs.
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
#248990
Al Gershwin

Re:Starmer's hardness 2 Days, 13 Hours ago  
Bearing in mind that Starmer is PM for just three months - after the Tories were in power for 14 years, leaving a National Debt of c£2.4T - are people not being rather quick to judge?
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
#248998
Green Man

Re:Starmer's hardness 2 Days, 8 Hours ago  
Al Gershwin wrote:
Bearing in mind that Starmer is PM for just three months - after the Tories were in power for 14 years, leaving a National Debt of c£2.4T - are people not being rather quick to judge?

Yet, Labour is still finding millions every day to house the boat people.

Smashing the gangs, Labour are doing granny bashing instead.
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
#249000
Wyot

Re:Starmer's hardness 2 Days, 8 Hours ago  
Al Gershwin wrote:
Bearing in mind that Starmer is PM for just three months - after the Tories were in power for 14 years, leaving a National Debt of c£2.4T - are people not being rather quick to judge?

Yes I agree with you Barney they are; but most people are quick to judge now with no attention span. Just how it is.
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
#249029
Green Man

Re:Starmer's hardness 1 Day, 16 Hours ago  
Starmer is less popular than Farage? I like to know the number of Labour voters who have buyers remorse. SKY News were having orgasms when they saw the exit poll. When I see bits of SKY News on Youtube,they now bitch about Starmer, same with the left wing rags like The Mirror and Guardian at times.

I want to know why people saw a pot of gold if Labour got in. All parties are the same, it's like someone gave you these choices of an STD; you can choose between syphilis, herpes or super gonorrhea.

www.lbc.co.uk/news/keir-starmer-unpopula...c-nigel-farage-poll/
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
Go to topPost New TopicPost Reply