IMPORTANT NOTE: You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.
Re:B-Liar caught lying AGAIN ! 16 Years, 2 Months ago
From the above BBC link -
"BBC world affairs correspondent Paul Reynolds said the revelations were "a serious embarrassment for the British government".
Former foreign secretary Jack Straw and former prime minister Tony Blair made statements in 2005, 2006 and 2007 saying there was no evidence that rendition flights had stopped on UK territory".
Re:B-Liar caught lying AGAIN ! 16 Years, 2 Months ago
In The Know wrote: He's not universally know as the Great B-Liar for nothing !
YOU knew EXACTLY who we were talking about !
That isn't evidence that he was lying on this occasion. You've side-stepped the question because you cannot answer it.
(Why are you referring to yourself in the plural? It's not healthy.)
Re:B-Liar caught lying AGAIN ! 16 Years, 2 Months ago
zooloo wrote: Past wrongs don't prove a current wrong.
Where is your evidence he was lying?
If it looks like a rat, sounds like a rat, smells like a rat and has a history of behaving like a rat ... then it's probably a rat !!!
I doubt very much that you could find even enough people to fill a Jury who don't believe that B-Liar has a history of (a) telling lies, and (b) being extremely economical with the truth (by evasion).
Re:B-Liar caught lying AGAIN ! 16 Years, 2 Months ago
In The Know wrote: zooloo wrote: Past wrongs don't prove a current wrong.
Where is your evidence he was lying?
If it looks like a rat, sounds like a rat, smells like a rat and has a history of behaving like a rat ... then it's probably a rat !!!
I doubt very much that you could find even enough people to fill a Jury who don't believe that B-Liar has a history of (a) telling lies, and (b) being extremely economical with the truth (by evasion).
Where is your evidence that he was lying on this occasion.
The idea that because somebody has a previous conviction therefore they are guilty this time too is not sound.
Innocent unless proven guilty - it's not difficult.
Re:B-Liar caught lying AGAIN ! 16 Years, 2 Months ago
zooloo wrote:
Evidence?
The lies he told in 2003 (saying that the US were NOT using UK territory for "renditions" (kidnap and torture) / those same denials repeated in 2004 and repeated yet again in 2005 ! ALL TURNED OUT TO BE UNTRUE !!!!
MORE than enough evidence to convict !
(PS - Can you please learn how to use the "quote" marks ?)
(PPS - Enough random use of capitalisation, and exclamation marks for you?)
Re:B-Liar caught lying AGAIN ! 16 Years, 2 Months ago
In The Know wrote: zooloo wrote:
Evidence?
The lies he told in 2003 (saying that the US were NOT using UK territory for "renditions" (kidnap and torture) / those same denials repeated in 2004 and repeated yet again in 2005 ! ALL TURNED OUT TO BE UNTRUE !!!!
MORE than enough evidence to convict !
(PS - Can you please learn how to use the "quote" marks ?)
(PPS - Enough random use of capitalisation, and exclamation marks for you?)
You have in your lifetime lied. Ergo you are lying now.
Saying something you believe to be true which later transpires to be false is not lying. Where is your evidence that he was lying on this occasion?
PS. What about quote marks?
PPS. When you are speaking to people do you shout random words?
Re:B-Liar caught lying AGAIN ! 16 Years, 2 Months ago
Did you see Channel Four News today?
Interview with former SAS soldier who said that UK troops regularly handed over prisoners to the Yankers in the full knowledge that they would be tortured, in contravention of the Geneva Convention.
Re:B-Liar caught lying AGAIN ! 16 Years, 2 Months ago
In The Know wrote: Did you see Channel Four News today?
Interview with former SAS soldier who said that UK troops regularly handed over prisoners to the Yankers in the full knowledge that they would be tortured, in contravention of the Geneva Convention.
The MoD (naturally !!) deny this.
Drip by drip ... the truth is coming out !
That isn't evidence that Blair was lying on this occasion.
You really are missing the real story here because of your narrow focus on Blair.