"Mr Shiner acknowledged that the bulk of the evidence relied on the five men's interpretation of what they heard while blindfolded..."

Remarkable hearing.

The piece also says -

"Showing images of corpses from the battle, Mr Day said: "The nature of a number of the injuries of the Iraqis would seem to us to be highly unusual in a battlefield.

For example, quite how so many of the Iraqis sustained single gunshots to the head and from seemingly at close quarter, how did two of them end with their eyes gouged out, how did one have his penis cut off [and] some have torture wounds?"

"[Panorama] had seen no proof that Iraqi prisoners had died at the hands of their British captors at or after the Battle of Danny Boy."

So, the bodies (on the battlefield) must have gauged their own eyes out - and cut off their own penises !

Can you really be as gullible as you pretend ?

Perhaps, like Baha Mousa (who sustained 93 separate wounds while in British custody - before strangling himself, which is what he must have done as no British were ever found guilty) they inflicted these wounds themselves?

In The Know wrote:
So, the bodies (on the battlefield) must have gauged their own eyes out - and cut off their own penises !

It seems you live in a very strange world coming to that conclusion.

Please reread it and consider that which you profess is absurd.

"Showing images of corpses from the battle, Mr Day said: "The nature of a number of the injuries of the Iraqis would seem to us to be highly unusual in a battlefield.

For example, quite how so many of the Iraqis sustained single gunshots to the head and from seemingly at close quarter, how did two of them end with their eyes gouged out, how did one have his penis cut off [and] some have torture wounds?"
--

The rest of the world can understand it - even if you (pedantically pretend that) can't !

In The Know wrote:
"Showing images of corpses from the battle, Mr Day said: "The nature of a number of the injuries of the Iraqis would seem to us to be highly unusual in a battlefield.

For example, quite how so many of the Iraqis sustained single gunshots to the head and from seemingly at close quarter, how did two of them end with their eyes gouged out, how did one have his penis cut off [and] some have torture wounds?"
--

The rest of the world can understand it - even if you (pedantically pretend that) can't !
The answer is... "We don't know".

First off it is necessary to determine that the images are what and where they purport to be. Then we move on with further evidence.

Innocent unless proven guilty - or is arbitrary justice fine so long as you think it is?

See it's easy really.

In The Know wrote:

The rest of the world can understand it - even if you (pedantically pretend that) can't !
Believing yourself to be "the rest of the world" is going beyond referring to yourself in the plural.

Anyway appeal to the majority, if that's what you're trying to do, is a logical fallacy - you seem use a lot of fallacy.

Stop crying wolf dear.

(PS random use of capitalising words and excessive exclamation marks is an indicator of a troubled and disordered mind - you would do well to consider that)