"Jersey remains could be animal"

The latest bones found at a former children

I mentioned this the other day. I'm waiting for them to start digging up Sir Jimmy's back garden if he has one. I have read some truly sickening things in the last few days via other messageboards I use (but no more ...I resigned from all of them when their admin let the posts stand). And as you say Jonathan, it's a good story that hasn't happened. No evidence of serial abuse, no mass graves, no nothing. Sweet f*** all in fact! And yet somehow this is still headline news.

As an octogenarian I despair of how our media manipulates, distorts, twists and corrupts for purely its own ends. It cares nothing about the 'victims' it merely stands as a latter day centurion, watching over all that it crucifies. Guilty or not.

what a blow for that Daily Mail "investigative" journalist who says she knew all about this 15/20 years ago. Not even one dead little kiddie yet when I'm sure she was hoping dozens of bodies would turn up.

Still they found a bathtub in a "torture chanber" ( basement to you and me)-that must mean something dreadful happened.

I don't think they'll be coming after Sir Jim just yet. He doesn't have a garden, btw. Sounds like they have three people in mind for arrest, although this might just be to satisfy the blood lust of a certain section of the public and media. Evidence of serious crime does seem to be lacking. Even if the remains they originally found are of a child, they have yet to establish cause of death. It may be that, at the worst, someone was guilty of not reporting a death. Evidence of murder or brutality will be hard to come by.