IMPORTANT NOTE: You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.
|
Home Forums |
Gary Glitter - what do others think?
TOPIC: Gary Glitter - what do others think?
|
|
Re:Gary Glitter - what do others think? 15 Years, 8 Months ago
|
|
Thank you all for your responses, It's great to hear others views, even if they do not agree with mine.
I'm not sure I would agree that Glitter had no input into his music. Mike Leander was no doubt a major player, writing the songs with Gary. Both Gary and Mike noted their respect for each other, most notably with Mike saying the he chose to make record with him after seeing him duing his days as the warm-up act for Ready, Steady Go, thinking he was better than all of the acts on the show.
The Glitter Band, however, played a very small part, they didn't even play on most of the records, let alone contribute anything to the creation of the work. They were generally a live backing band for Glitter. Even though they went on to score several hits of their own, their star never shone as brightly as his. I went to see then in concert a few years ago, and no doubt it was songs like "leader of the gang" and "do you wanna touch" that the crowd were really there to hear! I know I was.
I also believe his relavance in music went beyond 1975. Sure there was a retro aspect to all his comebacks; but it wasn't all "lets go and see this guy we once liked in 1975", by 1997 half his audience was not born then, or was too young to remember those days. A long list of cover versions and samples of his work (which is still being added too now) shows that he was a lot more influential than people are lead to believe. Sure, he was not Elvis Presley, but he was a great showman, he wasn't dubbed "the comeback king" for nothing. To go from a has-been in 1975 to selling out wembly in 1995 takes hard work.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Re:Gary Glitter - what do others think? 15 Years, 8 Months ago
|
|
Good points. The media are determined to turn him into an archetypal paedo hate figure (doesn't help himself with that awful long goatee and the glasses). Even 'quality' newspapers such as the Times and Telegraph have headlines such as 'Glitter to take advantage of NHS', and half the readers posting comments are calling for all the paedos to be killed, nobody seems to mind whether we do or don't have a rational discussion first of what exactly constitutes paedophillia or child sexual abuse.
The only thing we know for sure about Glitter (we can discount the dodgy 3rd world conviction, where there was clear financial incentives), is that he was guilty of downloading child porn. Now he was looking at some nasty stuff, not 17 year olds in thongs, but unfortunately, it seems a lot of Brits share his hobby. I remember reading that BT stated it was blocking half a million visits to CP sites a day or something incredible like that. Probably some of them then make the 'kill all the paedos' comments after they've masturbated to something sick.
The UK really depresses me now. We're so going backwards and who knows where it will lead? This hysteria is all a mask for the fact that we live in a moral vacuum and that most people, even parents, don't give a shit about children anymore. We've raised our children to be wild-like animals who stab each other for looking at each other the wrong way, something that even papers like the Mail were admitting the other week had something to do with the climate of fear that the paedo hysterias generate. The politicians, media and femi-nazis responsible for our society today are as much child abusers as Gary Glitter, whatever he's been accused and 'convicted' of.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Re:Gary Glitter - what do others think? 15 Years, 8 Months ago
|
|
Blackit wrote:
Good points. The media are determined to turn him into an archetypal paedo hate figure (doesn't help himself with that awful long goatee and the glasses). Even 'quality' newspapers such as the Times and Telegraph have headlines such as 'Glitter to take advantage of NHS', and half the readers posting comments are calling for all the paedos to be killed, nobody seems to mind whether we do or don't have a rational discussion first of what exactly constitutes paedophillia or child sexual abuse.
The only thing we know for sure about Glitter (we can discount the dodgy 3rd world conviction, where there was clear financial incentives), is that he was guilty of downloading child porn. Now he was looking at some nasty stuff, not 17 year olds in thongs, but unfortunately, it seems a lot of Brits share his hobby. I remember reading that BT stated it was blocking half a million visits to CP sites a day or something incredible like that. Probably some of them then make the 'kill all the paedos' comments after they've masturbated to something sick.
The UK really depresses me now. We're so going backwards and who knows where it will lead? This hysteria is all a mask for the fact that we live in a moral vacuum and that most people, even parents, don't give a shit about children anymore. We've raised our children to be wild-like animals who stab each other for looking at each other the wrong way, something that even papers like the Mail were admitting the other week had something to do with the climate of fear that the paedo hysterias generate. The politicians, media and femi-nazis responsible for our society today are as much child abusers as Gary Glitter, whatever he's been accused and 'convicted' of.
I wish such comments as this were more common in the newspapers and on TV. I used to check the BBC news website first thing in the morning, but now I come straight to JK's website.
RT
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|