At last I have found a case which also proves the point.
news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/hereford/worcs/7676997.stm
In the first hearing the judge ruled that the POLICEMAN could remain ANON !!!
In the last hearing the judge ruled he could not be tried on KIDNAP.
How taking a 13 year old off in his car ( when she was drunk ) could be anything other than kidnap is beyond me. Surely he should have phoned for Police back up rather than act on his own is such a delicate situation.
Shows how the legal system eventually protects "its own"