IMPORTANT NOTE: You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.
|
Home Forums |
For I'm Not... and others involved in the Baby P debate...
TOPIC: For I'm Not... and others involved in the Baby P debate...
|
|
For I'm Not... and others involved in the Baby P debate... 15 Years, 5 Months ago
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Re:For I'm Not... and others involved in the Baby P debate... 15 Years, 5 Months ago
|
|
An interesting viewpoint, JK, and on which I can concurr in one particular area because it probably ties up fairly closely with my own experiences of life "inside".
I don't really know what your own situation was, but I'd expect that, like me, you served your time on a VP wing.
While I was on mine- for the 6 months I spent, I got to know quite a few people who either shouldn't have been there for the very good reason that they were pretty obviously mentally ill or were there because "public opinion" would have been outraged had they received a community sentence. A very few were actually palpably evil {and there were some}, but most had more redeeming features than are usually credited to the "monster" that is the British Sex Offender in the eyes of the Great British Public. I found kindness, support and converstation in prison, something which would probably surprise the average Mail reader. In fact, apart from the surroundings and the bangups, nearly everything {and everyone} reflected a cross section of society at large. Your thoughts here are welcomed in at least this quarter. They serve as a reminder that we're all human beings, and we all have our parts to play. Thank you.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Re:For I'm Not... and others involved in the Baby P debate... 15 Years, 5 Months ago
|
|
I think that, when we commit a crime, there must be a penalty to pay, but I also think that once paid we should be free to continue our lives. To continually persecute people, based on past deeds, is counter productive. If someone is so bad that they pose a constant threat to society, then they probably have a serious menatl condition and need to be in a secure hospital for as long as it takes. However, if we keep our eyes on those who have committed crimes in the past, we might miss seeing those who are committing crimes now. Police time taken up with monitoring offenders after release - which should be the job of probation anyway - is only distracting officers from doing the real job.
As for the social workers and the doctor in the Baby P case; I think it is obvious that they have failed in their positions of high responsibility. I don't think they deserve persecution, but they have been found incapable of doing the job and it is right that they should be be asked to go find another which is more within their capabilities.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|