I'm looking forward to getting the cheque for the use of my copyrighted photo!

www.people.co.uk/news/news/tm_method=ful...93463-name_page.html

Love, love, love this - they fall for your tricks every time don't they JK?

Human nature is a wonderful thing isn't it, and the predictability of the meejah one of the finest aspects of all.

I've been amused to see that 123 people have checked out the picture in the photos section of bruised and battered King, as opposed to a mere 48 on the same page (19) of me smiling and suntanned by the pool in Morocco!

Mind you, go to page 7 of the Photos section and look at the photo of me there - with 13,933 views so far!

The facts that they use words such as 'pop paedo' amply demonstrates why it is our country is being completely ruined by the media. Thick, illiterate, hopeless individuals who should really be in classrooms armed with just crayons. But I wouldn't let them near children.

Not so long back they themselves were involved in Child porn...bearing in mind they used to have 16 year old children naked on their pages.

Funny enough the article is still there...but no picture...could it be the hint about copyright frightened these 'champions of decency'?

Ah, SE, the picture was carried in all the print copies.

I shall invoice them for £10,000.

Yes I must congratulate you..having once been in publicity you could have taught me a few things even though I was pretty good in my day.

It's odd that it was the People..once edited as you would know by the "distinguished London publisher" John Blake (Private Eye's description).

I found of all of the tablids-they would print any old rubbish I gave them.

Good luck getting your invoice paid !()..one reason I always preferred doing business with US publishers..they actually pay on time !

JK2006 wrote:
Ah, SE, the picture was carried in all the print copies.

I shall invoice them for £10,000.

If their circulation gets any lower it may well take them a while to raise it JK:laugh: