IMPORTANT NOTE: You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.
|
Home Forums |
the G20 protests - a wonderful development...
TOPIC: the G20 protests - a wonderful development...
|
|
Re:the G20 protests - a wonderful development... 15 Years ago
|
|
While I'd agree with you, BR, on the need for a change in the way we are policed I'd say that you have grasped entirely the wrong end of the nettle.
Reform - and the system needs nothing less - should first approach the overall demeanour of every police force in the country. IA has identified a fundamental problem, and that is that as long as our police service regard the law as being their own personal toy an attiude that "the job" is an entitlement to operate tangentially to it is just too good an opportunity to miss. The IPC is in many respects little more than a poor joke unless it embraces a vigorous attitude to its actual remit, and it's demonstrable that rather than acting as a cleaning agent the attitude is very much one of keeping things "in house". Any reform should start first with the fundamentals, as Veritas said in another thread justice should be tempered by mercy in any civilised society.
But where you go wrong - and horribly so - is to suggest that
"We need a change in Government and a new Commissioner VOTED FOR by the PEOPLE. The head of the MET should be elected and we should get a choice of at least 10 people. Locally there should be elected Chief Constables. If policing is bad then they should lose their job every 4 years.",
and it's that I'd like to demolish if you'd be so kind as to allow.
Policing by plebiscite? Are you serious? It's a matter of historical record that it was "The Sun" which got Mrs Thatcher into Number 10 and, when more recent events are chronicled, I'd strongly suggest that the same will be said of Tony Bliar... sorry, Blair. The British public want hanging brough back. And if you conducted any public poll they'd start by hanging Gary Glitter, Chris Langham, probably JK and me, along with all the other "nonces" that the media tells them they must hate. Any elected official must campaign, and the way we are policed {thefore the way what we laughlingly refer to as "The Constitution"
- habeas corpus, Magna Carta et al - is applied} becomes a matter for whatever way the wind blows for Murdoch and his willing band of sheep. Is that honestly what you want? A land where every four years {or whatever} everyone gets to vote for whichever bigot or axegrinder they want?
No, the police need to be commanded by someone entirely independent of politics, business or public interests, much in the same way as the police themselves should be. Someone vetted for religious or political bias, someone who embraces philosophical rather than dogmatic values. Someone appointed not by the fickle wiles of the Great British Public but by... well, I don't know who by because this whole thisngs a sorry mess that cuts to the heart of life in this country in the 21st century. But I do know that if you leave it up to a vote you'll get a successful candidate who has been selected at least in part by a homophobic, blinkered, xenophobic, racist electorate who believe that Gene Hunt is an admirable character and the police could do with some real policemen like that these days.
I honestly don't know what the answer is. But I know that we can't simply elect our way out of it. The national mindset is wrong. And that's where we have to start.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|