we may have to re-think Icke's lizard claims after the latest "missing link" discovery..
but I believe BR is fundamentally correct in his claim.
This databse sounds highly dangerous to me. If I had small children the very idea that all their details were stored on a computer would greatly fear me. No database is safe and we have found time and time again the very last people who can keep details confidential are government entities.
But it's not just the odious concept that govenments think they have the right to intrude into every single aspect of our lives..it's what a future government may do with the information that is always a concern.
Once these things are in place-getting future politicians to overturn them is a hurculean task. I think if anyone believes the next UK government led by Cameron wil change much of the Blair/Brown catastrophes, they are naive.
As to BR's 666 & Mark Of The Beast and chipping etc... some US states are already considering that so-called "sex offendors" (and that catergory has expanded to such a degree there that all involved in the 'Alfie' affair would be branded as such) be permanently made to wear a monitoring bracelet so their movements can be tracked.
'Pedos' today..car thieves tomorrow..footbal holigans..one day it will those who are late returning library books.
It's odd that in all my travels I find only 3 countries that seem to be following each other religiously in their stifling of civil liberites-the UK, USA and Australia but their common backgrounds must have something to do with it.
The rest of Europe survives without these restrictive actions including our so-called greatest enemies at times ..Germany & Russia.