IMPORTANT NOTE: You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.
So Man U beat a very depleted Man City without Adebayer, Robinho, or Santa Cruz. However what I would like to know is how can they score in the 95.5 minute when there was only supposed to be 4 mins of extra time to be played. Its another case of the Fergie's influence over referees at Old trafford, where they seem to get all the decisions.
Indeed. What goes on with referees at Old Trafford is scandalous, bordering on corrupt. I don't care who wins the Premier League, as long as it isn't Manchester United.
It was a good game going on the radio commentary, however both defences were woefull so I don't think that any of these will win it. Chelsea maintain their 100% record and I think they will go on to win it, experience counts for everything.
giles2008 wrote: I dont care who wins the premier league as long as it is Portsmouth!!
I was beginning to harbour hopes that Portsmouth may relieve Derby of their embarrassing record of a pitiful eleven points. Only joking, I expect that record will live longer than me.
robbiex wrote: So Man U beat a very depleted Man City without Adebayer, Robinho, or Santa Cruz. However what I would like to know is how can they score in the 95.5 minute when there was only supposed to be 4 mins of extra time to be played. Its another case of the Fergie's influence over referees at Old trafford, where they seem to get all the decisions.
I'll tell you how. 55 seconds for Man City to celebrate their goal and a further minute wasted on making a substitution to waste time.