IMPORTANT NOTE: You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.
|
Home Forums |
The BBC promote the POLITICS Of HATE
TOPIC: The BBC promote the POLITICS Of HATE
|
|
Re:The BBC promote the POLITICS Of HATE 14 Years, 7 Months ago
|
|
OK.
Having made a choice on which "Question Time" thread to make my comments on {and do there really need to be this many?} here goes. I apologise to anyone I insult or offend.
Firstly, let me say that I have no time for Nick Griffin. His politics stink and his attempts to turn fascism into a mainstream political philosophy turn my stomach. But the BBC, having made their choices, decided to allow him airtime. Or rather, they didn't.
What I found offensive about last night's QT was the bullyboy tactics employed by both the panel and the chairman alike. I'd hoped - in vain, as it turned out - that Griffin would be allowed to make his points fully enough for him to trip himself up. Give a man like that enough rope and... well, you know what comes next. Unfortunately the smart left audience in the smart left studio, in collusion with a panel more interested in outsmarting him than tackling point by point his odious creed, ensured that what resulted was a hysterical rant not by a fascist thug but by a ramped up audience and a panel who only actually appeared to be qualified to represent themselves as apologists for a discredited system. Criticism of Griffin making attempts to remodel the BNP is fine. But perhaps that criticism might carry more weight were it not presented by people like the Liberal Party {in recent years rebranded as "Liberal Democrat"}, "New" Labour and that fascinating group of people who now try to sell themselves under the banner of "Modern Conservatism".
If the pot is going to call the kettle black it really should make sure it's gleaming inside. Given the current crisis of confidence within each and every one of our Parliamentary parties' finacial shenanigins, perhaps it would have been better for these kettles to remain diplomatically quiet. Chris Huhne's biography makes a less than morally defensible read, while Jack Straw can {indeed does and has - consistantly} lie his way through any interview he gives. Baroness Warsi is an unknown commodity when it comes to reprehensibility, so I'll leave her out of this one. Bonnie Greer {pardon me} appeared to be there for little more reason than to chide Griffin in a schoolmarmish sort of way. As for Dimbleby's contribution to the debate...? It should maybe be pointed out that a chairman's job is to moderate and keep order. Is that an accurate description of what he was dong last night? Much as I hate to defend Griffin or his sick party, I have to say that it's a bit rich that all three major Parties have sacrificed every scrap of the conviction that shaped and defined their creeds and policies on the alter of career and crass popularism. The mad scramble for the "middle ground" has only resulted in an immeasurably bland parliament overseeing an equally conviction-free population. The age, 50 years on from the film, of "I'm Alright, Jack. Give us a celebrity to worship and a pedo to hate and we'll be happy as pigs in sh*t" is here, and it appears to have taken up permanent residence.
There has been much talk of Churchill lately. He'd hate this. And while we're on the subject of hate...
It's the BNP's proud boast that more than one million UK voters put their cross against BNP candidates' names at this year's EU elections. We should, in all fairness, ask "why?". There were perfectly good alternative candidates {and personally I voted Green} for the disgruntled "protest" voter. The argument that one million people voted BNP as a protest is about as convincing as the Allies' discovery of the total absense of Germans who had ever voted National Socialist. There are only two possibilities as to why one million voters appended their crosses to BNP candidates. Either they share that vile philosophy {or a significant proportion of it, or they are simply too stupid to learn the lessons of history. I wonder how many people voted NSDAP in 1933 as a "protest" against the Weimar Republic. I'm too aware of my own cynicism to be able to work it out for myself, so perhaps one of you can help me. Do we have at least one million Nazi sympathisers here or do we have one million people who are - to put it bluntly - too stupid to be trusted with their suffrage?
I watched last night's programme with a mixture of distaste for ALL the participants.There should have been a moral victory. Given the track records of those involved perhaps I shouldn't have expected very much. I just have this feeling that when the dust has settled and the papers have stopped misquoting people and generally lying about what actually happened all that will be remembered is what Dianne Abbott, appearing on This Week imediately afterwards, put into a context missing from QT... "5 people ganging up on someone". I hope not, for given the choice between the BNP and the status quo I'd rather have the latter, lousy though it is.
Democracy {and here's Churchill again} is the least worst system. But last night didn't show a triumph for democracy. Indeed, it didn't show democracy at work at all.
Fascism is evil. It must be shown to be evil. And the best way to do that is for it to be allowed to show its true face. QT, last night, missed that golden opportunity, and I fear that next time those one million idiots cast their vote for the BNP they won't be alone.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|