www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1231789...-carol-services.html

What a monster has been created.

Everyone is now guilty of being a PAEDO in New Labour's Britain.

PS CRB checks are also being done for Parents if they want to attend or help at School Discos and Fun Days or Fetes etc.

PPS Will the last SANE person please turn the light out on the UK.........the country is finished.

JK's "Satan's ultimate weapon of mass destruction" springs to mind.

The process is well under way.

While I agree that the laws are ill conceived and badly written, and open to abuse and misinterpretation, It's also very important not to ignore this sentence.

"A Department for Children, Schools and Families spokesman said: 'There is currently no legal requirement for parents to be checked in this way."

byw, BR, this country will only be finished once we give up on it. If we believe we cannot change anything, and we stop trying, then we'll be finished. Thankfully some of us are not ready to throw in the towel just yet.

All it would take for all this PC nonsense to be stopped is for everybody...yes, everybody...to say "NO! we're not putting up with this any more!" and refuse to have all these completely unnecessary checks. And then it would gradually fade away. No matter what anybody does, you can't check everybody just because somebody might or might not do something sometime.

I'm glad I'm not a child these days. My father could get very rough at times, especially if he felt that his honour was being insulted and if this was 1955 and he'd taken the eight years old me to a school carol concert and the headmaster refused to let him in until he'd been checked "because you might be a child molestor*", he would have been very insulted and knocked the guy flying with one blow from his huge right fist and then he would have grabbed the guy's shirt, dragged him up off the floor and said: "Don't you EVER say anything like that to me ever again, because next time, I'll bloody kill you! Understand?" "Ye...ye...yes!", the guy would wimper and my father would let go of his shirt and drop him to the floor!

Now, if a few people did that today and stuck up for themselves like my father would have done, we could put a sudden stop to all this nonsense. The problem today is that people complain, but don't DO anything! That's why the authorities think they can get away with things like this.

*In the 1950's, except in academic circles, the Greek word "paedophile", meaning "child lover" in English, was unheard of by the general public. Such people may have been called "Dirty Old Men", no matter what age they were, but they weren't called paedophiles. It takes all sorts to make a world and there always have been and always will be, men and women who are sexually attracted to children. But it's no more prevalent today than it was fifty or sixty years ago. In any case, a paedophile is hardly likely to start molesting children at a carol concert where he can be seen by everyone, is he? Obviously, common sense and paranoia don't exactly go hand in hand.

easier just to make every offender wear a coloured star depicting their offence:blink:

The annoying thing for me is that even people charged,and found innocent are on that database.

In the olde dayes when you were cleared of a crime the record would be wiped clean. This is why there is a justice system. If the evidence does not convict someone then it should be scrapped as a record.

They point at HUNTLEY - but they never took him to court - typically with the REAL offenders the Local Social Services covered it up.......so he would not have been stopped from being a caretaker - even with all these new rules that they claim are because of SOHAM.

Funniest thing as well is that the POLICE liason for the victim's family was himself a "Child Porn" customer. This shows the depth of genuine PAEDOPHILIA in the POLICE SERVICE. The safest place for Paedophiles these days is to work in the POLICE or GOVERNMENT.

99% of paedophiles would pass one of these checks which make them worthless. All the nursery abusers had passed these checks - Huntley would have passed these checks. The only people it discriminates against are innocent people who have to pay £65 each time to prove they are innocent......stupid and silly process. LIST 99 was a far better way of protecting children and £billions cheaper. Only convicted serious threats to children were on that list - and when they came to check the entire teaching profession less than a handful of staff had managed to get through this net - and even then none of them were deemed a real risk. That shows the system was not broken. It has been a total CON by New Labour to make more money for their friends in business.