A controversey swirling around the tabloids after a woman made allegations about her TV 'father' groping her in a sitcom 20 year ago when she was a girl.
The tabloid TV show salivating about it all keeps showing bits of the show where the 'dad' and 'daughter' sort of cuddle in the show..yet she says he 'cuddled' her in the dresing room.
Now others are steppig forward with fairly innocuous claims (to me)
I note those making the claims-including a male who says he walked in on the 'dad' who had his face 'close' to the girl's (assault ?) have had acting careers that went no-where.
Others who appeared on the show -all young and the same age as the girl, like
Delta Goodren and
Naomi Watts all say nothing untoward happened and they only have happy memories of the show.
Is there a correlation between success and failure ?
Into this steps the casting director who is a very odd character who dopped out to start a clinic for 'recovered memory' syndrome (now shown to be bogus) who is fronting TV making the claims she knew all about it but 'never had proof' but she must 'speak up'. Not that she has any proof now of course. She gets a fortune in govt funding for her 'clinic' ( a lovely country property)
The tabloid TV show making all the noise keeps talking about 'victims', then 'alleged victims' but I've never seen such a carefully crafted script(that's what it looks like to me) to totally condemn a still innocent man (the 'father') who now lives in Singapore with his family.
The host of that show was the one sledged by Gordon Ramsey last year before he apologised. He was right-her perormance would earn an Oscar the way she veered between 'he is innocent' at this stage but 'let's set the scene where he will never ever get a fair tial if charged'