I can't understand if those affected by a tragedy (like the relatives of murder victims) are brought into the judicial equation, why the other victims (relations of the person who committed the crime) cannot be heard too?
And why stop there?
Those affected by hearing about or reading about it?
If we are moving away from the facts into the emotions - can we try Tony Blair, the Prime Minister who has caused me great distress knowing MY TAX MONIES have been paid to murder innocent Iraqui civilians?