... widely reported yesterday.

She has told the Old Bailey today that she lied about the rape.

They start young !

It appears they were just playing "you show me yours and I'll show you mine !"

How come experienced prosecutors could not elicit the truth BEFORE the case got to the Old Bailey ?

What damages has this now done to the lads involved ?

IN THE KNOW

If you watch VILE PERVERT you will see that the PROSECUTORS never actually look into the cases they prosecute. They just go ahead with a "statement" and if that statement says "they raped me" they dont bother to check the evidence. They make what is called a HIERARCHICAL ASSUMPTION - in other words they just "assume" that because the three kids were playing together that the "Rape" happened. They only need to show that the the three kids were together to say that it happened. No medical evidence is needed - no collaboration - nothing - just the words from the girl in the interview saying in answer to the nice Police person asking "did they rape you" and then everyone in the room NODDING THEIR HEAD - so the little girl says YEAH.

Of course when cross examined the little girl is not old enough in this case to lie under such pressure - and is relieved to tell the truth that she was not raped.

Those involved should hang their heads in shame.

These poor kids have been through the mill because of the CRAZY ADULT world that we have created where kids cant be inquisitive anymore without massive adult sexual overtones being attributed to them.

It is truly sickening that adults can treat kids in this way.

The ABUSERS are THE POLICE ( and some parents )

In The Know wrote:
It appears they were just playing "you show me yours and I'll show you mine !"

How come experienced prosecutors could not elicit the truth BEFORE the case got to the Old Bailey ?

What damages has this now done to the lads involved ?

One of my earliest memories ( apart from fainting when I was just about to see our glorious Her Majesty ) was a game of "you show me yours and I'll show you mine !" with 2 girls. We were about 8/9.

I was conned-dropped my dacks and showed them my tiny worm. These girls tricked me-they didn't fufull their part of the bargain and ran off giggling (admitedly they probably had good reason to)

But it was a different age when such nonsense was just common childhood games. I doubt it affected me , certainly not more than the following week when a six inch house nail went right through my foot (I know what it's like to be crucified !)

How much of this absurd tale is due to the current hysteria. We seem to be teaching children from an early age that anything sexual is shameful and dirty. I hope these kids aren't psycholgicaly damaged.

veritas wrote:
I was conned-dropped my dacks and showed them my tiny worm. These girls tricked me-they didn't fufull their part of the bargain and ran off giggling (admitedly they probably had good reason to).

You can probably claim damages, veritas !

I'm thinking of claiming against the Catholic church. I was an altar boy but was never once molested by a priest ! This has psychologically damaged me - such rejection (lol) !

BR wrote:

The ABUSERS are THE POLICE ( and some parents )

I was told awhile ago, by a prop photographer friend, that hotographers rarely take shots of kids these days, especially those lovely baby shots where they were lying on a woolly rug - you know what I mean?

Too much to mis-construe !