www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-12814...s-rape-reaction.html

The Pussycat Dolls / Rihanna comments are particularly right in my view.

The Music Industry has sexualised very very young children through bands like the Pussycat Dolls etc. The videos for these acts AND stage shows should be rated 14+ only and shown after 9p.m at night.

Our society is rotten - not just the CPS.

The thing is, when adults talk about protecting children from sexualisation (especially the Daily Mail) they're usually trying to justify the forced desexualisation of teenage girls (which is just as harmful, and which is completely about the selfish interests of adults).

I think those kids in the rape case were corrupted by abuse hysteria far more than the Pussycat Dolls.

A 10 year old reading a Sun headline calling for the death of pedo gary glitter is just as much sexualised as by what's on page 3.

One obvious effect is to make girls accept the prevailing view held by young men (as evidenced on the internet) that they are just so much sexual fodder.


Another obvious effect of articles like this is to make girls believe they can get what they want and then cry rape when they feel like a slut afterwards.

The whole thing is not about children - it's really, deep down, about the social emasculation of the 'common man'. Alas us straight men are attracted to fertile females - that is females with womanly figures who are likely to produce offspring - and, as men, we feel this attraction whether or not we are 'attached' and whether or not we are to act on the attraction.. By sexulising the under 14's (as has happened in the past 10/15 years) and orchestrating the paedohysteria epidemic we now have a situation where a man may find himself physically attracted to, say, a buxom 15 year (who, no doubt, will be as fertile as turtle but emotionally immature) and wish to, for want of a better word, fuck her. By making out this is 'paedophilia' (ie the attraction to children, which it is not) the man can now start to question his own sexual leanings. Throw into the mix the under-14s dressing up like Pussycat Dolls/Rihanna etc (none of whom probably have a cognitive thought in their heads about anything like this) when the attraction would actually be wrong if, underneath the make-up their still lies a fairly curve-free child, and you can see the plan.
If things continue in the vein for a few more years what you see in 10/15 years time is straight men with normal urges and attraction seeing themselves as evil beasts - and one can see how disasterous that will be, especially in these mens roles as fathers. Dysfunctional is too soft a word....

and when Justin Beiber announces (after turning 16 in March) that he fancies the much older Kim Kardahian it's all regarded as a giant hoot when she says she is flattered !

But if she were a school teacher and he a supermarket shelf stacker cries of pedo would come into it somehow.

I'd also like to know what effect this pretence that fertile teens are children has on the number of real perverts and paedophiles in society. It seems obvious to me that if you create a situation in which the majority of men are forced to scream paedo at their own d**** and thoughts, that a fair percentage might develop the identity of a (real) paedophile and start to actively fantasise about toddlers and preteens. I know, for example, that in Spain and Italy - where you'll still see brickies openly ogling the buxum 15 year olds as they walk past, the sexual abuse of infants is far lower than here.