I've never for one second since his death doubted that Dr David Kelly was murdered, probably by "dark forces" close to Government.
The entire Kelly saga stank.
So the letter to the Times today from eminent doctors merely confirms my suspicions.
And I've always said - this is the timebomb that will culminate in Tony Blair facing war crimes prosecution and probably ending locked up.

Yes, as I said in the previous post ...the Hutton Inquiry has been totally rubbished - there are MANY questions to answer

www.kingofhits.co.uk/index.php?option=co...catid=2&id=61025

Dr David Kelly "exterminated" - www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1297444...ted-faces-probe.html

Totally agree.

This is the "murder" which will not go away.

JK2006 wrote:
I've never for one second since his death doubted that Dr David Kelly was murdered, probably by "dark forces" close to Government.
The entire Kelly saga stank.
So the letter to the Times today from eminent doctors merely confirms my suspicions.
And I've always said - this is the timebomb that will culminate in Tony Blair facing war crimes prosecution and probably ending locked up.

there is certainly something brewing with the Kelly scandal that just isn't going away unlike other similar cases.

I've always thought that Blair is quite mad..I mean really mad in a clinical sense.

veitas wrote:
there is certainly something brewing with the Kelly scandal that just isn't going away unlike other similar cases.

I've always thought that Blair is quite mad..I mean really mad in a clinical sense.

This was the main item on Newsnight last night .... seems that the media are determined to get to the bottom of this.

Front page headline news in Mail On Sunday today.

Michael Howard leading cross-party campaign for a proper inquest.

WHY did Lie-Bour impose 70 years "silence" on medical reports if nothing to hide ?

WHY is this the only violent death which has NOT had an inquest (even soldiers killed aborad get an inquest back home)?

Today's Mail front page reveals that 4/5 people don;t believe the "official" (and secret) verdict that David Kelly killed himself.

Didn't Labour put 100 year or so blocks on any information coming out about Dunblane?

Soham kids did not get an inquest either.....

Read into that what you want.

Looks as if this is a tactic when the STATE has something to hide.

BR wrote:
Soham kids did not get an inquest either.....

Read into that what you want.

Looks as if this is a tactic when the STATE has something to hide.

when I read about that I thought it was an absolute disgrace.

While the very idea of a dead child is so horrible to think about, and the idea that they will be cut up in an autopsy, surely the victim and their family deserves (if not the public as well)at the very least a completely accurate and full account of how and why they died via an inquest.

I agree with your conclusion-there is something to hide.

veritas wrote:
[quote]BR wrote:
-there is something to hide.

The Daily Mirror now joins the campaign with a front page lead article.

Daily Telegraph now leads with this as its main story -

The Attorney General has signalled that he is prepared to intervene in the controversy over the death of Dr David Kelly, admitting that those who doubted his suicide “may have a valid point”.

www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/poli...vid-Kelly-death.html

What frightens me is how come, when so many doubted from Day One, it has taken so long? It really does make one think that BR's "coverup" theories may have some foundation.

JK2006 wrote:
What frightens me is how come, when so many doubted from Day One, it has taken so long? It really does make one think that BR's "coverup" theories may have some foundation.

When the government are the main suspects, and they decide whether there will be an inquiry, and then they select the "judge", and they set his terms of reference, and control how the "decision" will be released, and with what supporting evidence,(and what will be "hidden" for decades), are you surprised ?

JK - I think I am the only person writing regularly on here who has worked for the Government. Therefore, I am better placed to comment on cover ups than most.

Since Thatcher was forced out there has been some sort of influence within UK Government which is not positive. I believe that people like myself - David Icke - and many others have just picked up on this.

Blair took it to a new level and Brown continued it. Cameron and Clegg being a double team are harder for this influence to pin down. That is why the BBC are working OVERTIME to try and undermine the Co-alition.

We need a co-alition because then it is harder for this malign influence to wield too much power over our leaders. That is my hope anyway because you can see the struggle going on within the Co-Alition as each of their policies is fought for against the BBC and the BBC Supporters.

The BBC allied to SKY seem to be pushing a strange republican sort of USA left sort of politics onto the UK whereby they want to destroy England and Britishness - at least in their News coverage that seems to be the aim.

Note that the BBC has not done a large documentary on David Kelly - that was left to other smaller channels - hence Blair thinking that "They" had got away with it. The "They" is likely to be the rogue forces who are controlling the World governments and who have magically disappeared the money leaving Europe and USA drowning in debt.

This is now economic warfare - which is far superior to bombing for these people/