Interesting read.

I believed that every murder requires a Post Mortem and Coroner's inquest.

This is what is portrayed in ALL TV dramas......

If true then surely HUNTLEY can appeal against his conviction - and an Appeal Court would surely be forced to release him.

Therefore, I find this account interesting but it would need to show sources for its claims such as a "report" saying no inquest was heard etc.

Having said that - the report's overall suggestion that the POLICE are capable of "Stitching up" is quite true - and it happens all the time.

The POLICE have a real problem with people of "Good Character" such as SION JENKINS because they find that they cant throw any dirt around against these types of people - hence their STITCH UP comes UNDONE once it is analysed in a forensic way - albeit taking up to 6 years for this to take place.

When the POLICE decide to "Stitch" up someone they break all the rules - yet the JUSTICE SYSTEM rarely holds them to account for this.

There are many TENS OF THOUSAND people locked up in our Prisons who should not be there because they are innocent of their convictions.

This is why the Crime Rate never goes down - despite locking up more and more people. The REAL CRIMINALS are protected by the POLICE !!! They remain outside the PRISONS whilst "Patsies" are put in Prison.

If you offend a POLICEMAN or WOMEN - then you are likely to find yourself in court faster than you can say STITCH UP.

The POLICE use the Justice System for their own ends and to settle scores with people ( Often in their extended families ) whom they have grudges against.

They do this rather than fight real crime ( which is dangerous and means dealing with nasty people )

This account is possibly true - and if it is then surely someone from the press should investigate it properly - and do a TV programme on the basis of examining the CLAIMS. Until then it is clear the conviction of HUNTLEY cant be safe.........and if that one cant be safe then it brings into question nearly every conviction under NEW LABOUR and their SPIN MACHINE.

BR wrote:
If you offend a POLICEMAN or WOMEN - then you are likely to find yourself in court faster than you can say STITCH UP.

Unless of course you came out of the initial encounter as the clear "winner" ... in which case the police will tend to steer well clear.

Any approach whatsoever is likely to produce screams of "harassment" and with the previous case to back this up, the police will be definately on the defensive.

While I don't know enough about any of the cases (except perhaps the Bamber case which at the time I was convinced was as presented by an extraordinary media campaign but now looking at the facts-it seems sooo questionable).....what strikes me most of all and including the David Kelly death is the complete lack of genuine investigation like post mortem's etc.

From JFK to Kelly and many in between-such as the poor little girls in Soham, surely the public has a right and a need for every single aspect of a case to be examined in the minutest detail if for no other reason that so much can be learned for future investigations.

I believe we are entering a very dark era and it's slipping upon us as we are dazed b false celebrity that comes from every angle.

So much so that a woman with learning difficulties who can hold a song together like S. Boyle becomes a massive star in the vein of a truly unique singer like Frank Sinatra.

Still..you can always pop along and buy a book written by a politician who invaded 2 countries and is directly responsible for tens of thousands of deaths.

( Mein Kampf made Hitler a millionaire as well)