terroronthetube.co.uk/latest-77-articles-3/the-jaguar-at-luton/

7.7 has always seemed strange....not least the bloke getting on a bus...rather than going on the tube ( he seemed to be frightened of the real bombs which had gone off ? )

Were these 4 men SET UP and thought they were taking part in the PROJECT that was taking place at the same time to test the emergency services ( which we all know is true )

So what and who was the JAGUAR at Luton all about ?

Read this article and make up your own mind.

I am coming to the conclusion that we are being lied to BIG TIME about 7.7 etc.

I was travelling across London that day. I normally hate being crushed into tube trains, but for some reason that time I squeezed into one that was packed out. Good job I did - the next train was the one that blew up. I haven't used the tube since, I just can't bear it.

I'm not sure about the significance of this Jaguar, but there is certainly a bit of a pong around the official narrative.

Peter Power of Visor Consultants was running a major terror drill that morning. A team of around a hundred people were simulating the exact same scenario, at the exact same locations, at exactly the same time.

Power gave two separate media interviews that day saying how the 'hairs on the back of his neck stood up' when they realised their test scenario was unfolding in real life.

Now, I'm no statistician, but I'd be willing to wager that the odds of this happening are somewhere in the region of extremely improbable to near-on fucking impossible.

Nobody in the media has ever questioned this, and Power has remained tight lipped as to who he was working for that day.

The fact he has not been called before the inquiry is very odd, to say the least.

Yes - PETER POWER.

It would seem likely that the FOUR PATSIES were working for his simulation to give it some sense of reality. They were probably promised lots of money as well.

Surely they have got Peter Power to the Official Enquiry >? Because I dont believe in a co-incidence like that......

The chances are BILLIONs to one.

I always remember those reports that day of shots being fired in Canary Wharf. They disappeared as quickly as they were announced, and are part of the argument in the 7/7 Ripple Effect documentary.

Plissken wrote:
I'm not sure about the significance of this Jaguar, but there is certainly a bit of a pong around the official narrative.

Peter Power of Visor Consultants was running a major terror drill that morning. A team of around a hundred people were simulating the exact same scenario, at the exact same locations, at exactly the same time.

Power gave two separate media interviews that day saying how the 'hairs on the back of his neck stood up' when they realised their test scenario was unfolding in real life.

Now, I'm no statistician, but I'd be willing to wager that the odds of this happening are somewhere in the region of extremely improbable to near-on fucking impossible.

Nobody in the media has ever questioned this, and Power has remained tight lipped as to who he was working for that day.

The fact he has not been called before the inquiry is very odd, to say the least.

something has always felt very odd about 7/7.

You point out a bizarre aspect...the fact that exactly like 9/11...a "simulated" exercise was happening at the very same time.

This co-incidence is just too strange for words.

One must always look to who benefits from an action...terrosists or those who would control us more than they already do ?

steveimp wrote:
I always remember those reports that day of shots being fired in Canary Wharf. They disappeared as quickly as they were announced, and are part of the argument in the 7/7 Ripple Effect documentary.

On the day of the attacks I was travelling to work at HSBC in Canary Wharf. My train was held outside Waterloo for ages. When it eventually arrived the police were saying the tube was closed due to a 'power surge'. When I found out it was bombs, I turned around and went home.

The next day, my office was buzzing with the story of three terrorists being shot just outside the building. Colleagues told me that they were ordered to stay away from the windows, and were not even allowed to leave the building until early afternoon.

Yes - at 9.11 there was the fact that all the Airforce Planes were taking part in a simulation....and that is given as the excuse why they did not take the "Hijackings" seriously at first.

I see some stupidity written here sometimes but this takes the biscuit. Clearly none of the posters here watched the BBC documentary '7/7 The Conspiracy Files' broadcast last summer which examined every single conspiracy theory surrounding the terrorist attack, including every single outlandish claim in the daft "Ripple Effect" film and debunked them totally.

Including this:

Plissken wrote:

Peter Power of Visor Consultants was running a major terror drill that morning. A team of around a hundred people were simulating the exact same scenario, at the exact same locations, at exactly the same time.

Power gave two separate media interviews that day saying how the 'hairs on the back of his neck stood up' when they realised their test scenario was unfolding in real life.

Now, I'm no statistician, but I'd be willing to wager that the odds of this happening are somewhere in the region of extremely improbable to near-on fucking impossible.

Nobody in the media has ever questioned this, and Power has remained tight lipped as to who he was working for that day.

Because you see Peter Power was interviewed in the film, laughed at the conspiracies surrounding him and explained that the "major terror drill" was him presenting on a whiteboard to a team of 8 executives the services his company provide in disaster recovery and staff training, with the "bombs everywhere" scenario one of the hypotheticals he commonly sketched out in all such presentations.

So in short, the media questioned it, Power explained and the conspiracy theory was shattered. How disappointing for you all.

The programme also tracked down the man who created Ripple Effect, a strange weirdo with an anti-Muslim fixation and somebody who has a vested interest in circulating lies. If you buy into anything said in the silly video then you are simply playing into the hands of an extremist racist.

More details and video here:

news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/8124687.stm

steveimp wrote:
I always remember those reports that day of shots being fired in Canary Wharf. They disappeared as quickly as they were announced, and are part of the argument in the 7/7 Ripple Effect documentary.

Yeah, once again because there were no shots fired in Canary Wharf. There were never "reports", just wild rumours, of the kind that spread when people are worried and confused. Funny how amongst all the thousands of people who work in Canary Wharf, not one single person saw anyone being shot or any bombers wandering around. Anyone would think it was a made up story or something.

Whatever happened to people's brains?

That BBC documentary was a complete white wash I'm afraid. It was structured badly for a documentary and spent most of the time going after Mr Hill in Ireland, the producer of the 7/7 documentary, attempting a character assassination. It only answered parts of the 'conspiracy' it wanted to and ignored a great deal of what the arguments are.

Do you honestly think, "The Truth", that the government has told us the truth? I don't necessarily go against the '4 Islamic terrorists' model we have been told, but there's a great deal that we have been misinformed about.

The Truth wrote:
[quote]steveimp wrote:

Whatever happened to people's brains?

Dear Mr. Truth,

In this world that we live in, there are some things that are simply too terrible to comprehend.

One is the notion that, for whatever reason, we may outlive our own children.

Another is the idea that a government, whose prime responsibility is the protection of its people, would ever perpetrate, or allow to be perpetrated, an act of terror on those people. For that reason, even when presented with irrefutable evidence to the contrary, most people simply refuse to believe it.

Sadly, history shows that our leaders are not always as benevolent (or as honest) as we would like them to be.

Take the assassination of JFK. Less than a year after rejecting the CIA’s infamous Operation Northwoods false flag operation, he was dead.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Northwoods

Even though the Zabrucker film CLEARLY shows the back of Kennedy’s head being blown off, consistent with being hit by a high velocity round fired from somewhere in front of the motorcade, the official story is that Oswald fired the final, fatal round from the book depository. Behind the motorcade.

By the way, if you want to see the effects of a gunshot wound to the head, pop onto YouTube and have a look at the lovely Blackwater mercenaries taking pot-shots at Iraqi civilians. Note how their heads tend to follow the trajectory of the bullet. They do no jerk off in the opposite direction.

As well as this, the official JFK story amazingly hinges on the Warren Commission’s single bullet theory, made famous in Oliver Stone’s JFK. I prefer the term magic bullet; because the feats that bullet performed that day defy all known laws of physics (much like the collapse of three, yes three, steel-framed skyscrapers on 9/11).

Anyway, the above points regarding JFK appear to offer conclusive proof that the official, lone gunman theory is bogus. This alone should alert anyone with a modicum of intelligence to the fact that someone might be telling porkies. Yet we allow the truth to be hidden from us.

Whatever happened to people’s brains? Indeed.

I've no idea who did 7/7 or 9/11 but there is always a conspiracy..always.

Whether it's those involved according to the offical story or someone else.

The easiest way to confuse the truth though is to encourage other conspiracies and secret government agencies are excellent at that and have always done it.

D-Day in WW2 was one of the most famous conspiracies that fooled the entire German nation...why does anyone think governments simply packed up and decided not to engage anymore in conspircaies ?

You always have to think who benefits from a conspircay ...and ever since JFK every US president has basically towed the line.

Since 9/11 just about the entire West has given up many of it's freedoms for a threat that has killed less people than die on the roads in Tasmania in a year.

As I've got older and, I think, wiser I've discovered that, almost every time, the truth is a blurred combination of numerous things and there is always more to things than meets the eye.

Just as neither extreme is correct (the official story or the conspiracy theory), the reality is in the middle - much confusion, some corruption, some concealment, a lot of inefficiency and usually, most crucial of all - it has to be A GOOD STORY!

Some facts, some invention and a huge quantity of exaggeration.

There are some very strange questions to ask regarding the activities of 'the four':

Why drive to Luton? Were they meeting someone there?
Why take the train? Why not drive further into central London? Who cares about the congestion charge or leaving the car to the clampers?
Why the return tickets?