This is in the news today
news.uk.msn.com/world/articles.aspx?cp-documentid=155227080
Now, while I don't agree with what the book
appears to advocate (although I haven't read it, nor can I necessarily judge properly from only the title) I
do think people should be allowed to write, read and sell material on this, or any other, subject.
Banning such publications because we don't approve of their content is an inadequate basis for restricting freedom of expression and is the top of a very slippery slope. The same criterion could be used to justify banning Mein Kampf (because some people find it offensive, and others turned into Nazis after reading it
) or Dracula (because it's scary and turns people into vampires) or DVDs of Texas Chainsaw Massacre (because it's yukky and turns people into Texans).
In fact, if we're going to ban things just because a majority of people doesn't like them, f**k it, let's ban opera, Star Trek conventions and possibly marmite.