www.digitalspy.co.uk/forums/showthread.p...ghlight=gary+glitter

"What???" I didn't think such a thing existed either, but here it is.
Note my sizeable contribution and my attempt to draw atttention to a certain gobshite tabloid editor's part in GG's rise & fall. Usual silliness from a couple of fools, expected odd remark about JK too - but in the main astonishly constructive/reasonable - as well as highlighting that people still actually want to hear the music still.

Nice to see most contributors staying the right side of hysterical for a change.

I'm always puzzled by people linking personalities with professional output. The Isrealis do it with their ban on the music of Wagner (a very active anti-semite). But the man's music (and Gary Glitter's and Pete Townshend and just about anything JK had a hand in) still sounds great, just as the films of Polanski still have merit.

If we start using dislike of personal characteristics as an excuse to condemn someone's output, we very quickly find that everything is banned. Mozart was a gambler - ban all his music. Jay Kay is a dangerous driver - no more airtime for Jamiroquai then. Michealangelo was gay - hey let's smash David and paint over the Sistine chapel ceiling.

the American Civil Liberties Union has said for years you could beat a 16 yr old half to death and do less time than looking at a naked pic of them.

What a plonker of a mayor-she should be bombarded with useless info.

Oh dear... and the comments made by the idiot who posted it are incredible!

The bloke in the middle of that looks nothing like him facially.