As reported here and elsewhere
www.mirror.co.uk/news/top-stories/2010/1...men-115875-22737094/
I don't buy this for a second. All these attacks in police stations covered in CCTV and no mention of any witnesses or footage? Allegations of him passing on heroin, but no supporting forensic evidence, nor any mention of where he might have procured it? The tape he made of his superior threatening to keep digging until something was found? Note also that he was found guilty of relatively few of the sex attack charges, indicating that evidence relating to other alleged attacks was unreliable or insufficient.
It looks like a classic trawling case, with no corroborating evidence at all, and a glaring lack of evidence that SHOULD exist if the allegations were true.
I think the poor bloke's been shafted.