IMPORTANT NOTE: You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.
|
Home Forums |
Back to Prison because of a £50 fine that is not mine ?
TOPIC: Back to Prison because of a £50 fine that is not mine ?
|
|
Back to Prison because of a £50 fine that is not mine ? 13 Years, 5 Months ago
|
|
I have received a threat letter regarding the £50 fine for when a chap called MARK SLOCOMBE ( black barbadian from Islington ) attempted a car burglary in 2005 and did not attend his Rehabilitation Order. Some NICE Policeman transferred my details to his case and I received the letter 3 weeks ago and now a follow up saying that it is prison or bailiffs who will take hundreds of pounds of my belongings.
When I ring up they refuse to talk to me to sort it out and urge me to employ a solicitor.
So - someone has stolen my identity and transferred their criminal record onto me ( could only have been done as an inside job ) for a crime from 2005 with a home address in Islington ( where I have never lived in my life ) and now I am being threatened with bailiffs or prison.
This is what happens when you stand up to the Police or State.
My monthly diet of news is threats by the Police of prison and arrest and has been ever since I started blogging on this site and for other publications about the excesses of the Police.
Sad to say I used to have some decent lawyers but because of the large amount of unpaid work they did for me that stopped representing me in July 2008 and since then I have been unable to find a solicitor who will work for me for free and I have very little income due to the collapse in the Music Industry and sadly I have no back catalogue of personal hits to fall back on or savings.
Therefore, I am resigned to the possibility that either I will lose hundreds of pounds of possessions next week or be thrown in prison somewhere to take the rap for this person whom I have never met and have only heard about in the last 3 weeks.
I realise that some of you will think I have lost my marbles and this is not happening to me - but I assure you it is. I have the paperwork here in front of me and am totally stunned by this.
Sometimes I have to pinch myself - because if you had told me in the 1990s that our country would be taken over by "these" "people" I would have laughed because it is like something out of a Hollywood B Science Fiction Movie. The only problem is that it is not funny.
I urge you to download these books and give them a chance - your programming will keep saying to you as you read them - "this is nuts" "this cant possibly be true" but I am still keeping an open mind on then both and I think the evidence is actually in favour of both these books being true.
www.dmt-nexus.com/Files/Books/General/Da...-%20The%20Threat.pdf
www.courtneybrown.com/publications/specu...enonfictionpubs.html
Keep an open mind and check out these books by top University Professors and see if you can see anything in them that could potentially be informative to explain our current planetary sets of problems.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Re:Back to Prison because of a £50 fine that is not mine ? 13 Years, 5 Months ago
|
|
I'd say you've flipped. But that's nothing new.
Should you "disappear" in the near future I'd say it has more to do with the less than glowing reaction to your increasingly attention seeking postings.
The police? DESPERATE to shut you up? I know how they feel. Unfortunately I don't believe a word you say.
You truly are not that important. And your inability to come to terms with that is at the root of your real problems. It is in this area that you really should seek the help that you so obviously need. Someone lately accused ITK of being narcissistic. If he was - as opposed to being the genuinely nasty little git the undoubtedly was, then your own condition shades his by many, many degrees. Your need to feel important is becoming almost palpable. Get the help you need. Do it now.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
Last Edit: 2010/11/25 21:55 By Locked Out.
Reason: Unneccassary Rudeness
|
|
|
Innocent Accused in Tenerefe
|
Re:Back to Prison because of a £50 fine that is not mine ? 13 Years, 5 Months ago
|
|
That BR went away a while back was not in doubt,that it was prision I think was established at the time from court records.The rest of it of course is not provable,and is at the discression of the reader.
I would myself like to see less NWO nonesense,and at the same time it would be nice if others would take more time to promote their own posts,not contimual sniping at other posters.It is of course JKs board,and he is more than capable of policing it.
Anyway its 24 degs outside,and a street cafe beckons for my dinner
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Re:Back to Prison because of a £50 fine that is not mine ? 13 Years, 5 Months ago
|
|
Innocent Accused in Tenerefe wrote:
...it would be nice if others would take more time to promote their own posts,not contimual sniping at other posters.It is of course JKs board,and he is more than capable of policing it...
My dear IA.
When I made my {admittedly premature, though I did hint that I'd be back} "retirement" address I noticed you made similar comments in reply, so I take it that it is toward me {at least in part} that this comment is directed. Also in that reply you charged me with being able to dish it out but not take it. I'm still not at all sure what the "it" you referred to was. I made it abundantly clear at the time that my departure was prompted by the virtual flooding of this board by one particular poster whose views I found deeply offensive. As far as I'm aware I have never been the target of whatever "it" was, so whether or not I can "take" whatever "it" is remains untested. You also made reference to my "ghastly crimes against a child", which demonstrates very clearly that you have failed to read not only the text of my postings here properly but also the subtext. I've never referred in explicit terms exactly what it was I served my sentence for, but it certainly wasn't for "ghastly crimes against a child". So less of the "sniping" routine, please. The pot is calling the kettle black, and the kettle is well armed and able to defend itself against your charges of "sniping" - themselves a {now repeated} very fine example of sniping.
If it's against the spirit of this board to hold people to account for the things they present here - or to demand evidence for what are demonstrably outlandish claims or statements - it is for JK {as you have just pointed out} to make that clear. And if I take BR, in particular, to task that's hardly surprising. His are usually the postings which require the highest level of examination. If you read them and take them at face value you do yourself little service. If you don't read them at all you do him little service. And if you accuse me of sniping because I believe {as I have said before} that people should be responsible for the things they write and question my right to hold such threads up to the light of close scrutiny then you do me little service. And while I may be seen as BR's persecutor, I am, I hope, fair minded. I am on no crusade - I have no axes to grind, no especial interest in any group I see as in need of justice. I don't have the luxury of being "innocent accused" because I did all the things I was charged with and went down for. And for all my experiences in life, in and out of prison, I hope to be able to say that I wish to live in a peaceful society which respects the law. It's law and order every time for me, so when I read a thread demanding an answer from someone who believes that a police force is a fundamentally good idea you may be sure I'll pursue it vigorously and without apology. I may be a hypocrite but at least I'm an honest one, and I consider my contributions here to be not entirely without merit. Others, of course, may feel differently, but it's up to them to make it known.
So before you make any further snide little remarks about people repeatedly "sniping" I'd like you to remember that I was among the first to wish you good luck on your day in court.
I'd also like you to bear in mind in future that, in referring to you in private correspondence, I expressed the opinion that you seemed to be a straight, honest guy who I truly believed to be innocent. I don't start too much here in the way of threads. To be honest there aren't that many things that get my goat enough that don't manage to get covered by other people.
But that doesn't mean that my other contributions are in some way unworthy. I never write that which I don't believe entirely - and I hold my hands up to getting carried away in my passion for the debate.
I've been punished for real crimes. Please don't attempt to traduce me for ones of your invention. They're not worthy of me and they shouldn't be worthy of you. Have a nice holiday.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|