Interesting to note this was primarily for pictures and 'grooming' over the net.No actual sexual contact took place.

these grooming charges are troublesome but it appears that in this case he was justly charged and convicted.

it's the cases where Mr plod actually does the grooming while pretending to be a child that I find a worry.

However-as this chap was convicted for inciting a child to pose and act (very unsavourary) where does that leave a propular Sunday tabloid that iuncited now underage girls to do likewise.

we live in a bizarre time and seeing the climate is turning on us maybe we will all be punished ..God is showing her/his displeasure!!

what does 'iuncited' mean ??

incited of course. I'm sober as well. I hate typing.