IMPORTANT NOTE: You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.
|
Home Forums |
TOPIC: ITK 1 - 0 Veritas
|
|
ITK 1 - 0 Veritas 12 Years, 11 Months ago
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Re:ITK 1 - 0 Veritas 12 Years, 11 Months ago
|
|
"But its annual report also warned that there were still "significant risks" which may need a policy response."
Hardly a sound victory,more a chance to continue for another day.
And as for the scoring don't forget you've lost most of the others
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Re:ITK 1 - 0 Veritas 12 Years, 11 Months ago
|
|
The IMF doesn't always want other countries to follow US policy, but often to do what will benefit the American economy, even if it is to the other countries' detriment.
Take the giving of loans to countries that are struggling. Those loans are often riddled with 'conditions' for the granting of the loan. Conditions which grab the receiving country by the short and curlies, desperately needing the loan yet fearing the consequences of the conditions attached (which invariably favour the US economy).
Take the example of Ghana. A country once self-sufficient in many respects, now reduced to importing one of its staple ingredients, rice, from.... the US. Subsidised rice which undercut the local producers and destroyed the Ghanaian rice industry whilst greatly benefiting US producers.
news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/from_our_...spondent/1634514.stm (especially the end).
The World Bank isn't much better. And don't get me started on the IMF / World Bank and how they handled the transition to capitalism in Eastern Europe. The father of a friend of mine was an interpreter in the talks the World Bank/IMF held with the Communist government prior to the change of regime. What I heard was shocking.
So do I trust that the IMF has a neutral, disinterested view of things? No.
Do I trust their published opinions? No.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re:ITK 1 - 0 Veritas 12 Years, 11 Months ago
|
|
"The IMF predicted the UK would grow by 1.4 per cent in 2008 and 1.1 per cent in 2009, down from the 1.8 per cent for 2008 and 1.7 per cent for 2009 that it predicted in of 2008. It said inflation at 3.8 per cent was higher than expected, and inflation expectations were rising even as economic activity was slowing. That, the IMF said, meant the Bank of England had little room to cut rates. It didn't exactly turn out that way. In August 2008, the IMF didn't even spot that the UK economy had entered recession in April 2008.
Osborne has already turned, as the economy is slowing even before public spending cuts hit. The government's economic strategy is in disarray, no matter which of Osborne's pals he gets to say otherwise."
The IMF has no credibility in forecasting the UK economy
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Re:ITK 1 - 0 Veritas 12 Years, 11 Months ago
|
|
you are using pretty desperate example ITK...Greece !
Germany, Italy, France, Spain, Denmark -in fact all the Scandanavian countries all have far more 'leftist' governments than the UK and are doing nicely thank you with welfare benefits that shame the UK.
Russia, China under communism steaming ahead..Venezuala under lefty Chavez introducing welfare benefits all round including cost price only restaurants throughout the country.
Even Australia the only industrialised country to avoid the great financial meltdown (and gave every welfare recipient $1500 to spend spend spend it's way out of a recession successfully), thriving like no other and because it has a very left wing Greens Party that controls the Upper House so no retrograde policies can get past them.
And which countries have almost gone bust and still could ?..the 2 that control the world's finances..GB & USA both with right wing governments ( Blair/ Cameron/Bush/Obama).
back to the drawing board for you.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|