IMPORTANT NOTE: You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.
Re:I was one for christ's sake! 12 Years, 9 Months ago
a very important program.
Perhaps they will go after the pedos who published the topless snaps of kids in The Sun..we know who they are !! (we might have to wait until a certain lady comes out of Holloway )
Re:I was one for christ's sake! 12 Years, 9 Months ago
Leave it up, JK. It may as well be seen for the pathetic and rather sad attempt at revenge that it clearly is. Most of us here, though, are adults and it doesn't warrant personal offence on my part. It also says absolutely nothing about me but stacks about the person who posted it. Thanks for your considerate question, though.
Re:I was one for christ's sake! 12 Years, 9 Months ago
Seems most of the trouble here comes from non registered posters.why not make them all register,be easier to check up on that way,and if people can't be bothered to spend 5 mins registering then do we really need them here ?
LO,many of us appreciate your efforts here,ignore the gutter element,they're just our forum clowns
Re:I was one for christ's sake! 12 Years, 9 Months ago
Good point, IA.
This board does screen messages before they are posted, wouldn't it be possible to have a few simple house rules, and simply not approve deliberately inflammatory posts?
Re:I was one for christ's sake! 12 Years, 9 Months ago
One man's "inflammatory" is another man's "pointed". Barbed comments {and God knows I use them often enough myself} are often, like Casca's in Julius Caesar, rudeness which "is a sauce... which gives men stomach to digest... words with better appetite". Now we don't get too many of these {least of all from me}, but I fear that rigorous screening of comments or postings would lose us valuable contributions. It seems to me that a particular poster, working as he appeared {to me at least} to be, to an unsavoury agenda {hence his representation of PIE as a "political movement" commited to the "lowering" of the age of consent - a huge misrepresentation of an organization which in reality seeks no less than the removal of the age of consent} has, in JK's word, "flounced off" and is now belatedly decided upon a flaming campaign {which will probably be limited to a couple of postings anyway}. Block postings like this, by all means. But I feel we may well throw a few babies out with what is admittedly extremely dirty bath water if we do.
Re:I was one for christ's sake! 12 Years, 9 Months ago
Locked Out wrote: One man's "inflammatory" is another man's "pointed". Barbed comments {and God knows I use them often enough myself} are often, like Casca's in Julius Caesar, rudeness which "is a sauce... which gives men stomach to digest... words with better appetite". Now we don't get too many of these {least of all from me}, but I fear that rigorous screening of comments or postings would lose us valuable contributions.
Re:I was one for christ's sake! 12 Years, 9 Months ago
steveimp wrote: Hmmm, not good that someone is taking a clip from an exceptional piece of satire in vain.
Steveimp - not on his usual IP address as I'm travelling on a train between - I kid you not - Grimsby and Scunthorpe!
You must have very bad karma from a previous life to travel between those 2 places
Still at least you travel and post,not sit in the local saloon bar getting your world view from the NOTW