register-her.com

Convicted false rape accusers named and shamed.

Pity about the gender element.

JK2006 wrote:
Pity about the gender element.

Indeed. And if such a website as this were to appear in the UK and were to feature exclusively male subjects we'd all be screaming on KofH how completely counterproductive it was. Altogether a pretty nasty piece of very selective, very sexist webbery.

Locked Out wrote:
JK2006 wrote:
Pity about the gender element.

Indeed. And if such a website as this were to appear in the UK and were to feature exclusively male subjects we'd all be screaming on KofH how completely counterproductive it was. Altogether a pretty nasty piece of very selective, very sexist webbery.

I think you're missing the point altogether (as usual).

Society doesn't just have a website featuring near exlusively men, it has an actual offenders register based upon the breaking of laws that are increasingly set by women and that have always targetted men. The names and addresses of these men are published (in America) for everybody to see, even after those men have served their ever more harsh custodial sentances.

Meanwhile, female false accusers do not have to sign any register and are free to date unwary men with impunity after their (usually non-existant) punishment.

Most of these women on register-her just got a caution or a slap on the wrist for trying to destroy the lives of men - men who would have wrongly gone to prison for years and then be put on public registers for the rest of their lives. The addresses of the women on register-her aren't published and nobody is likely to engage in vigilante behaviour against them.

The site doesn't just cover female false accusers, it covers women who have committed crimes against men in other ways. It would be good to have a similar site that covered both male and female false accusers, but this is a response to sexism and the hatred of men in society.

I get your point Only but I do tend to side with LO; not only as far as the gender issue goes (men lie too) but also because, whilst tempted, I'm not keen on allowing myself to act in the same way as the other side.

There is a lot to be said for OUTING false accusers. And a lot to be said against it. There must be more decent ways.

This just encourages the same sort of witch hunt and vigilantism that Sarah's/Megan's law would encourage. A web site like this would discourage genuine victims of rape from coming forward and pressing charges, in my view its just another form of cyber-bullying.

robbiex wrote:
This just encourages the same sort of witch hunt and vigilantism that Sarah's/Megan's law would encourage. A web site like this would discourage genuine victims of rape from coming forward and pressing charges, in my view its just another form of cyber-bullying.


100% agreement. Well put.

JK2006 wrote:
I get your point Only but I do tend to side with LO; not only as far as the gender issue goes (men lie too) but also because, whilst tempted, I'm not keen on allowing myself to act in the same way as the other side.

LOL if you think that men make false accusations against women to the same extent.

There is a lot to be said for OUTING false accusers. And a lot to be said against it. There must be more decent ways.

Some people speak of a gender war, but a war implies that both sides have turned up for the fight.

Annihilation is a more appropriate term.

robbiex wrote:
This just encourages the same sort of witch hunt and vigilantism that Sarah's/Megan's law would encourage. A web site like this would discourage genuine victims of rape from coming forward and pressing charges, in my view its just another form of cyber-bullying.

Your comparison isn't valid.

Megans law is a state law requring that residents be informed when a sex offender moves into their neighbourhood. Sarahs Law is a much watered down version of this in which parents have the right to know (on request) if an adult in contact with their children is a sex offender.

False rape accusers don't even have to go on any state register. For that matter, they rarely even recieve a custodial sentance. And the reason for this is the ingrained sexism in society and the fact that most sex offenders are male and most false accusers are female.

The idea that this will lead to vigilantism is absurd. Maybe if society treated a false accusation as seriously as the original accusation - but it doesn't. And if and when it does, presumably such evil women will be properly punished by the courts and be forced to go on a register. At which point, there will no longer be any need of this site.

Locked Out wrote:
robbiex wrote:
This just encourages the same sort of witch hunt and vigilantism that Sarah's/Megan's law would encourage. A web site like this would discourage genuine victims of rape from coming forward and pressing charges, in my view its just another form of cyber-bullying.


100% agreement. Well put.

You agree with him? So when did you ever attack the publishing of male sex offender's names?

OnlyIfTheyreWilling wrote:


I think you're missing the point altogether (as usual).

Oh, there is a "point" to be missed,is there?

OnlyIfTheyreWilling wrote:
Society doesn't just have a website featuring near exlusively men...

If you're talking about the UK {your reference to "society" makes this unclear, but I'm guessing that's what you mean}, it doesn't "just have a website", in fact it doesn't have a website {at least not an official one} carrying offenders'details at all. You're being fallacious.

OnlyIfTheyreWilling wrote:
...it has an actual offenders register based upon the breaking of laws...

Well it took a while but you finally managed to put 12 words together that make sense and are entirely truthful.

OnlyIfTheyreWilling wrote:
...that are increasingly set by women and that have always targetted men.



I'm fascinated by your seeming knowledge of the origins of lawmaking. If you are going to make claims like this I think we need some evidence. The laws on rape, for instance, have their origins in a time when there were no women in the legislature. We might say the same for anti-pornography legislation, or the raising of the age of consent from 11 to 16 {how many women MPs in 1885?}. As far as "targeting" is concerned, this is just more fallacious bluster on your part. By far the greatest numbers of sex offenders are rapists and child abusers. Jailed under legislation which has been with us since Victorian times.


OnlyIfTheyreWilling wrote:
The names and addresses of these men are published (in America) for everybody to see, even after those men have served their ever more harsh custodial sentances.

Which, I'm sure we'll all agree, is entirely wrong. Once the "debt" to society is paid the {hopefully reformed} former prisoner should be allowed to get on with rebuilding their lives.

So why are you supportive of a website which appears to be of precisely the opposite way of thinking ?

OnlyIfTheyreWilling wrote:
Meanwhile, female false accusers do not have to sign any register and are free to date unwary men with impunity after their (usually non-existant) punishment.

No one should have to sign a register once their tariff is completed.
And that should apply to both sexes equally. I can't be any clearer than that.

OnlyIfTheyreWilling wrote:
Most of these women on register-her just got a caution or a slap on the wrist for trying to destroy the lives of men

To go through the whole list would be terribly depressing. However of the sample 30 I just pulled up at random nearly all the women were serving jail terms.



OnlyIfTheyreWilling wrote:
- men who would have wrongly gone to prison for years and then be put on public registers for the rest of their lives.


I know. It's terribly wrong. I'll only ask you this. How many of the judges involved in the sentencing were men? I'm willing to bet on a fairly high percentage. Sexism can also be of the benevolent kind, and women have always tended to fare better than men in this area. Blame the men. Not the feminists.

OnlyIfTheyreWilling wrote:
The addresses of the women on register-her aren't published and nobody is likely to engage in vigilante behaviour against them.

Oh, OK. And that makes things oohjah-cum-spiff and entirely responsible, does it?

OnlyIfTheyreWilling wrote:
The site doesn't just cover female false accusers,...

Well thanks for pointing that out, I'd have missed it otherwise.

OnlyIfTheyreWilling wrote:
it covers women who have committed crimes against men in other ways. It would be good to have a similar site that covered both male and female false accusers, but this is a response to sexism and the hatred of men in society.

"It would be good to have a similar site that covered both male and female false accusers"??? It wouldn't. The law should deal with these things, not websites.

In short what your arguments {as usual} are based on is a distrust of women and a feeling of extremely deep emasculation. I've advised you before to seek help and I can only further urge you to do so rather than continue to seek out "evidence" of the oppression of men by women on the internet. It's terribly sad.

This is really a symbolic gesture.If looked at in this way it does make sense.
If we had a level playing field at the beginning I would oppose this,but given the PC nonsense we have as our current law then any symbolic action taken serves as a warning.

"A web site like this would discourage genuine victims of rape from coming forward and pressing charges" Not really. Genuine victims of sexual assault would not be dissuaded from reporting by a website dedicated to FALSE accusers. This is a BS argument used merely as an excuse to let (female) false accusers off the hook, and to make it easier to persecute innocent men. Plenty of genuine victims of sexual assault would applaud efforts to expose false accusers, who minimize real sexual assault. Many readers at False Rape Society are genuine victims of sexual assault themselves, and they would heartily disagree with you. Unless and until society properly punishes false accusers, register-her.com is one way of outing women who take advantage of the system in a world that otherwise is unwilling to protect men from them, and in fact enables bad women to do great evil against men and families.

Only says... "LOL if you think that men make false accusations against women to the same extent."

Some of us are well aware that men (and boys) make massive false allegations against other (often older) men.

Locked Out wrote:
When it comes to false allegations ThingsAreBad. And while it's certainly true that sexual relations must be entered into by people OnlyWithConsent, the discussion of the issues surrounding that consent can be carried on by interested parties with authority OnlyIfTheyreWilling. I've recently become interested in multiple personality disorders. Anyone else notice that it seems to be so much more prevalent these days?

..yes.

we live in a society now that increases mental illness.

Society was far more 'constructed' in it's aims but now it's driven by ideology and there are factors..ie :a 'consumerism' that is almost impossible for a huge minority to keep up with. Recent mindless ugly riots are a great example.

Although In The Know would dismiss all these people as scroungers, it's far more serious and politicians of today really offer few solutions, just slogans and 'punishment' for being at the bottom of the heap.

People will lash out in all sorts of ways...and false sex assault claims are one because it is so easy with little chance of condemnation if found to be lying.

Great example..my solicitor in Oz, the late respected John Marsden(other clients include serial killer of backpackers and Saddam Hussein) was falsely accused by young men and TV show..eventually won $6M in damages and died a year a later from cancer he always claimed was caused by stress of the case.

His accuser ?...put up in luxury for 3 years by TV station and received government "victim's " compo in thousands although proved his claims were a series of lies and impossible to have happened ( not unlike as JK says..dates etc ...however Marsden had a series of outraged private investigators, barristers who all worked for free ...something few citizens can get)

However I really am opposed to the website mentioned on here as I think the end result will be to increase 'hysteria'.

Tougher penalties for false claimants would be better and higher standards to prove assault..today it's just one's word against the others.

Locked Out wrote:
When it comes to false allegations ThingsAreBad. And while it's certainly true that sexual relations must be entered into by people OnlyWithConsent, the discussion of the issues surrounding that consent can be carried on by interested parties with authority OnlyIfTheyreWilling. I've recently become interested in multiple personality disorders. Anyone else notice that it seems to be so much more prevalent these days?

Hmmmm....you think that on this forum, that has an emphasis on the false abuse industry (due to the owner of the board having his career destroyed by it), only one person could possibly think that treating the crime of false rape accusations as seriously as rape is a good thing?

And ThingsAreBad is a men's rights activist (not me) : thingsarebad.blogspot.com/

JK2006 wrote:
Only says... "LOL if you think that men make false accusations against women to the same extent."

Some of us are well aware that men (and boys) make massive false allegations against other (often older) men.

Yes indeed, and that's how I took your original point in this thread.

The abuse industry has been largely created by man hating evil radical feminists, driven forward by financial profit, the tabloid democracy, and imported American sexual puritanism.

Unfortunately, homosexuals like yourself are merely collateral damage in terms of the feminists' real aims (the criminilisation of male heterosexuality and the innate preference for female youth and beauty).

And homosexuals will suffer more and more collateral damage until they learn to criticise feminists.

This website is here to protect men,and after my own experiences I'm prone to agree with it.