IMPORTANT NOTE: You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.
It's ridiculous David, for the simple reason that the best way to fight a cause they know they will lose is the cotton wool approach; allow slow progress which is in fact suffocation by neglect.
JK2006 wrote: It's ridiculous David, for the simple reason that the best way to fight a cause they know they will lose is the cotton wool approach; allow slow progress which is in fact suffocation by neglect.
'Repressive tolerance,' as Herbie Marcuse and Co called it in the 70s.
JK2006 wrote: It's ridiculous David, for the simple reason that the best way to fight a cause they know they will lose is the cotton wool approach; allow slow progress which is in fact suffocation by neglect.
Are we actually OK to discuss the case JK, it's not subjudacy (if I can spell the word after 2 cans of Coke) or anything like that?
Prunella Minge wrote: JK2006 wrote: It's ridiculous David, for the simple reason that the best way to fight a cause they know they will lose is the cotton wool approach; allow slow progress which is in fact suffocation by neglect.
'Repressive tolerance,' as Herbie Marcuse and Co called it in the 70s.