Anyone see it?

It was an attempt by the BBC to investigate the Police "getting away" with gross misconduct and so forth, but yet it seemed instead to include a Police Officer sentenced for perjury and assault saying he was innocent (JK, would they allow you this honour?), despite CCTV showing what he was doing.

It was a typically watered down "investigation" that was so obviously produced in full co-operation with the Police, given that it included an interview with a Chief Constable and going out with a Police Officer.

It's on iPlayer but it's really obnoxiously done - it's like setting out to prove X is a Murderer, but at the end the presenter says, "he obviously isn't."

steveimp wrote:
so obviously produced in full co-operation with the Police

it included an interview with a Chief Constable and going out with a Police Officer



Understand your view Steve.

But these two points simply don't gel.

Mundie wrote:
steveimp wrote:
so obviously produced in full co-operation with the Police

it included an interview with a Chief Constable and going out with a Police Officer



Understand your view Steve.

But these two points simply don't gel.

It's the co-operation angle Mundie, therefore there is no way in hell that this 'documentary' would be a full expose into the crimes of Police Officers and how they are gently forgotten about, because it was made in full backing of at least two police authorities and probably ACPO too.

Get Roger Cook.