cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Go to bottomPost New TopicPost Reply
TOPIC: Leveson Inquiry
#77144
Leveson Inquiry 12 Years, 6 Months ago  
I'm hooked; Hugh Grant's evidence is fascinating; Veritas has commented in a thread below but I'm glued to it (and may be involved).
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
#77147
veritas

Re:Leveson Inquiry 12 Years, 6 Months ago  
go and give evidence..imagine the front pages..and they would have to soooo circumspect in what they said.
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
#77149
Re:Leveson Inquiry 12 Years, 6 Months ago  
What is it that celebs would like to see happen? I'm not sure I understand. Forgive me. But in one breath they wish to see more regulation...but that would ultimately mean less publicity. To be honest I think it's all bollocks.

So what celebrities want is a restricted and regulated press?

I'm not at all convinced. They have to decide themselves wether or not a free press is important.

If not then the only alternative is regulation and stricter rules.

As far as I'm aware Hugh Grant does not want a free press and would sooner see tighter laws and regulations. Which is he asked for when appearing on Question Time.

But I doubt all celebs think that way.
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
#77175
Re:Leveson Inquiry 12 Years, 5 Months ago  
Garry Flitcroft, whether because he's a Northerner or a footballer or perhaps just thick, seems to have serious cognitive distortion problems and appears to be quite incapable of expressing himself or of understanding simple questions.

And he does no service to the cause; he legitimately had affairs which, sadly for him, the press should have been quite able to publish.
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
#77180
veritas

Re:Leveson Inquiry 12 Years, 5 Months ago  
The Fat Controller wrote:
What is it that celebs would like to see happen? I'm not sure I understand. Forgive me. But in one breath they wish to see more regulation...but that would ultimately mean less publicity. To be honest I think it's all bollocks.

So what celebrities want is a restricted and regulated press?

I'm not at all convinced. They have to decide themselves wether or not a free press is important.

If not then the only alternative is regulation and stricter rule

As far as I'm aware Hugh Grant does not want a free press and would sooner see tighter laws and regulations. Which is he asked for when appearing on Question Time.

But I doubt all celebs think that way.


I think Hugh is pushing his luck on the 'my private life is private' angle. And yes most 'slebs' would cut their granny's throat for a front page Sun story.

I still want a free press but I'm not worried about celebrities..it's the ordinary person who should have the ability to get retractions or some sort of re-dress..you know the errant vicars and such.

As it is- the rich have access to libel laws and the poor don't which means a two-tiered system of law.

And what other profit making industry in the land demands 'self regulation" (I'm sure they all would love to)..that is a complete joke. They simply cannot be trusted and are basically bullies.
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
#77182
Re:Leveson Inquiry 12 Years, 5 Months ago  
Coogan is better than Grant; by making unfounded suspicions public, Hugh gave the media a perfect excuse to deny the allegations.
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
#77194
veritas

Re:Leveson Inquiry 12 Years, 5 Months ago  
The Mary-Ellen Field / Elle McPherson saga is most illuminating ..(and Elle looking very bad having taken a job with Murdoch's daughter and not apologising).

a great example of the damage done but for every high profile case there are hundred people out their in the suburbs whe have suffered similarly.

Don't forget the TV star crucified because he holidayed in Sri Lanka and was accused of all sorts of faleshoods...career finished.

and then of course the setting up of Gary Glitter...a slow burner that will explode at some stage.

now you know why Murdoch is retiring to a country property in Victoria.
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
#77196
Re:Leveson Inquiry 12 Years, 5 Months ago  
Excellent page in today's Sun by my friend Jane Moore - balanced and sensible (she was openly critical about my prosecution and coverage at the time).
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
#77198
veritas

Re:Leveson Inquiry 12 Years, 5 Months ago  
in my completely hypocritical way very worthy of Fleet Street I made a nice sale to the Sun this week.

just shows what reptiles we can be
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
#77204
Re:Leveson Inquiry 12 Years, 5 Months ago  
Mark Lewis not bad...
Although I'm getting worried by several lawyers going "a..a..a..a.." before they speak and breaking off mid sentence to start another.
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
#77225
Re:Leveson Inquiry 12 Years, 5 Months ago  
Max Moseley seemed rather good I thought; Siena Miller so-so; JK Rowling reasonable.

The good old legal method of suffocating truth with boredom is working well; soon we'll be nearly comatose; then the Devil's ultimate weapon will be unveiled...

ARCHBOLD!

And we'll all die.
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
#77367
Re:Leveson Inquiry 12 Years, 5 Months ago  
What a wonderful speaker Chris Jefferies is.
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
#77374
Re:Leveson Inquiry 12 Years, 5 Months ago  
Anne Diamond - probably the best witness yet. Clearly showed there are good and bad sides to our media.
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
#77381
Re:Leveson Inquiry 12 Years, 5 Months ago  
I thought Chris Jefferies was superb earlier today, as was the intelligence officer who got away with the F word
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
Go to topPost New TopicPost Reply