Is this of any interest here? I just came across it. Sorry if it isn't, but I hope no harm in posting, assuming it hasn't been already.

falserapesociety.blogspot.com/

Best Wishes, Jim

sounds good..a victim's group for real victims.

Yea, I've posted comments that contained links to that and other men's rights sites in the past, often they didn't get past the moderators.

Locked Out wrote:
This is an interesting allegation, for it suggests that things are being "moderated" out of the forum for no other reason than a dislike of the person who posts them or of the information they carry.

I'd welcome comments from either JK or one of the "guilty" Mods.

As far as I know postings here go unmoderated unless they contain rude or inflammatory language. Are you sure that's not the reason why yours were subject to removal?

Unlikely, as sometimes I've simply provided the link.

And yes, moderation has been unfair in the past - for example you've again implied that I'm a paedophile, and yet I'm aware that if I respond by simply factually decribing you as you yourself have repeatedly described yourself, my comment won't get approved.

Though perhaps JK or the mods are of a likemind with you - any criticism of women is rude or inflammatory. Let's hope they can explain to us.

Silly children.

JK2006 wrote:
Silly children.

Well, I agree that these spats between myself and Locked Out are getting tedious, especially for others here. I have no intention of continuing it, and I didn't start it.

I would say though, I'm surely not the only person here who thinks it's slightly amiss that someone with his admitted past thinks that men (and boys) should be placed on the sex offenders register for 'leering' at semi-naked women and girls in the street.

I mean, if Peter Sutcliffe was released from prison, joined this forum, and started lecturing others that anyone who swats flies is an evil murderer, and that anyone who admits that women are sexually attractive needs immediate psychotherapeutic help, and to top it all, repeatedly boasted that he always tips prostitutes the most, because he's so chivalrous and polite to them..well it would be a bit disturbing, to say the least, wouldn't it?

I'm positive there is no censorship (apart from what may be legally problematic as I am wont to do after 3 G&Ts).

where else Would I be allowed to prove my superior thought processes to the likes of ITK?