cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Go to bottomPost New TopicPost Reply
TOPIC: Mtv Flux v Youtube
#12828
Martin

Mtv Flux v Youtube 17 Years, 6 Months ago  
One of our videos via the new MTV server for uploads, has caught up the viewings of a replaced posting we did on Youtube in less than a day, to a weeks posting on the afore mentioned hoster.
It seems to show that TV support still beef up and overtake a net only viewing, for indie stuff, and good to see.
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
#12833
Re:Mtv Flux v Youtube 17 Years, 6 Months ago  
Did it actually feature on MTV or is it by download from the MTV site?

Wondering if this the proof of promotion/marketing or a case of "where" it is.

Either way - cool (Or should that be kewl? )
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
#12834
Martin

Re:Mtv Flux v Youtube 17 Years, 6 Months ago  
They use the tracks on video on the website as gap fillers, they come up as very high quality. We sent a 7mg file and they took the whole thing.
Youtube compressed it to under a meg.
You never know at first when your track will be used, but as the mixed shows are pre-made, you soon start to recognise which stream they are showing.
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
#12835
Martin

..just noticed some extra clever marketing as well.. 17 Years, 6 Months ago  
Whe you click on the videos, sometimes randomly, you get a message saying "Warning Do Not View this Video, it is innapropriate for showing".
Very clever, this of course doubles the views.
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
#12847
Re:..just noticed some extra clever marketing as well.. 17 Years, 6 Months ago  


Yes the "May offend some people..." keeps me watching for a while at least.

It's good they're streaming it at a decent quality, taking 7 MB down to 1 is going to ruin some stuff. But perhaps poor quality is better than nothing at all for producer and viewer alike.

Cheers Martin.
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
Go to topPost New TopicPost Reply