cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
RCA priorities; Thom way above Lordi...
Go to bottomPost New TopicPost Reply
TOPIC: RCA priorities; Thom way above Lordi...
#5274
RCA priorities; Thom way above Lordi... 17 Years, 11 Months ago  
correct in your opinion?
Which act has more global potential, do you think?
Lordi chart at 25; Thom gets a hyped number one album (must have cost a fortune; how long until the bottom line ceases to be red?).
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
#5278
Re:RCA priorities; Thom way above Lordi... 17 Years, 11 Months ago  
Neither are a great prospect IMHO... but you could say Lordi are a novelty act outside of metal (and inside metal to some extent) whereas Thom does have that Mary Hopkin generic that could sell wider.

But a major betting on either looks like pretty desperate stuff I have to say. Is there really nothing better out there?
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
#5286
Supposing ... Sandi Thom is the musical antichrist 17 Years, 11 Months ago  
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/...y/0,,1793785,00.html

I've not heard that Sandi Thom single all the way through yet, but I've seen the TV ad about six billion times, and the short, poxy burst on that is more than enough to convince me that if her sudden rise to stardom WASN'T the end result of a shrewd marketing campaign, the implications are terrifying. Because to believe the official story - that thousands of people voluntarily subjected themselves to this shit online, then recommended it to their friends - is to lose your faith in mankind completely.

There's a simple way to settle this once and for all, and that's for the huge crowd of people who apparently watched Thom's inaugural bedsit webcasts to step forward and make themselves known. Come on. Hands up. I want to see your faces. And then I want you smacked to death with brooms. You people are the enemies of fun. Your bland emissions pollute the atmosphere, threaten the environment. For the sake of humanity, you must be stopped.
I don't know. Maybe I'm wrong. Maybe Sandi Thom genuinely touches some people. Whoever they are, I can't relate to them. Woody Allen once marvelled with horror at "the level of a mind that watches wrestling", and I'm the same with Sandi Thom fans. All I hear is that telltale, indefinable something that immediately marks it out as something that's bypassed the soul completely: consumable noise for people who don't like music but know listening to it is "the done thing" - like mutant imposters mimicking the behaviour of humans. I can't relate. It doesn't go. I'm being alienated by the replicants.

There's a word for this sort of thing. It's not "art", it's "content". And it's everywhere, measured out by unseen hands, mechanically dangled over the replicants' flapping gobholes; flavourless worms for android hatchlings.
Sometimes I can ALMOST see where content is coming from. Take Angels by Robbie Williams. It's a massively popular piece of content, beloved by millions. If I strain really hard, I can just about make out some genuine emotion. Just a speck or two - but enough to make its huge success at least vaguely explicable. Compared with anything that has any semblance of balls whatsoever, Angels is a bowl of cold mud - but next to most content, it's a towering emotional epic. It almost makes you feel something. No wonder it's become the official theme tune for thick people's funerals.

Anyway, back to Sandi Thom. As luck would have it, while typing this article, I've just heard I Wish I Was a Punk Rocker (With Bollocks in My Mouth) on the radio, and the real braintwister is the lyric, in which she yearns for a time "when accountants didn't have control and the media couldn't buy your soul". It's a boneheaded plea for authenticity, sung in the most Tupperware tones imaginable: a fake paean to a pre-fake era. It's giving me vertigo.
Wait. It gets worse. I've just looked it up on Napster - oh Christ. I didn't realise how far this had gone. The B-side is a cover of No More Heroes by the Stranglers. "Whatever happened to the heroes?", she warbles, knowing full well she's replaced them. She's the musical antichrist.

This is too creepy to be mere coincidence. Someone's messing with us. The replicant kings are trying to mangle our minds. Plug your ears. Block the signal. Final phase. They're taking over.
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
#5290
Re:RCA priorities; Thom way above Lordi... 17 Years, 11 Months ago  
It's a bit of an academic debate, but I'd go for Lordi. They are, after all, a better joke. They also got where they are by making considerably more people giggle. There's a WYSIWYG element to them that cannot be knocked.

Besides, Lordi are already an int'l act. What's the int'l interest in Thom?
 
Logged Logged
 
  Reply Quote
#5301
Spiritwalker

Re:Supposing ... Sandi Thom is the musical antichrist 17 Years, 11 Months ago  
Andy cameron's song I want to be a punk rocker but my mamma wouldn't let me, Is much better that sandi's, and thats saying something..lol
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
#5302
MC MC

Re:Supposing ... Sandi Thom is the musical antichrist 17 Years, 11 Months ago  
Good heavens, the B-side of 1978's hopelessly optimistic "Ally's Tartan Army"!

Sandi Thom is the 21st century's answer to Don Partridge.
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
#5328
Benito

Re:RCA priorities; Thom way above Lordi... 17 Years, 11 Months ago  
I'm not so sure that it was an over night success. I remember when that punk rocker song came out last year the first time round and was a big hit on Radio 2. But wheater she was hyped or not to #1 the second time, I can not stand that song.
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
Go to topPost New TopicPost Reply