Jonathan Fisher KC was appointed by the home secretary last October to review the challenges involved in investigating offences that involve large volumes of digital material.
As he explains in preliminary findings published today, “the process of disclosure is a critically important part of criminal legal proceedings which guards against injustice by ensuring that the defence is made aware of information or material which undermines the prosecution case or assists the defence case”.
Non-disclosure, he adds, played a part in the case of Andrew Malkinson, who was cleared of rape after he had been wrongly imprisoned for 17 years. Proper disclosure could also have avoided the Post Office scandal.

There are Worldwide few variations of the same oath: "To affirm that all the testimony you are about to give in the case now before the court will be the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. This you do affirm under the pains and penalties of perjury."
(A high standard also for fake media to achieve?)

I.E. Lies of OMISSION are CRIMINAL perjury.

Too much committed by bent-cops, also CRIMINALLY committing 'Witness tampering' or unseen GROOMING of witnesses to CRIMINALLY favour a prosecution false case.

E.G. Touching a BLUE shirt to indicate a BLUE door -DOH!

slate.com/news-and-politics/2004/04/how-...om-got-its-oath.html