IMPORTANT NOTE: You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.
|
Home Forums |
TOPIC: One rule for one
|
|
Re:One rule for one 3 Weeks ago
|
|
Honey wrote:
[quote] Wyot wrote:
Well, if the judge says Fox was mistaken, he must have been, but I can understand why he may have THOUGHT that the man simulating masturbation with a giant fake penis to a crowd of children might have been a paedophile.
The judge was not saying Fox was mistaken in saying the two are peadophiles; neither was the judge saying the two aren't paedophiles.
He (or she) was saying Fox had no evidential basis to make his categorical assertion on a public forum, and so defamed the two concerned (who I know nothing about).
It doesn't matter what Fox thought. Fox though tries to make it a matter of the judge defending gay "paedos" over white straight warriors for truth like him who fight for "freedom of speech".
When it was just about the (correct from what I have read) application of defamation law.
Fox had all the freedom in the world (defamation laws pointedly uphold freedom of thought) to criticise their behaviours (we live in a free society) and also suggest to they might be paedophiles as a result.
But this distinction is apparently lost on him.
This story is just about defamation law, nothing else. Yet of course Fox and so many others want it to be an extreme: the death of free society!!!!!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|