Forgot to add, I remember finding a website around the time of Rolf Harris's first trial, so 2014, about Liz Mullinar, which was quite critical. It seems to have disappeared. I think I remember that her father, whom she accused of abuse, was a cleric of some kind.

Found these:

Her Wikipedia page is quite informative, but this includes details not on that page: alchetron.com/Liz-Mullinar

...
In 2002, Kezelman attended a “healing week” at Mayumarri, a group-therapy retreat for sexual abuse victims run by former casting agent Liz Mullinar. Like Kezelman, Mullinar had suffered a nervous breakdown in her 40s and recovered memories of sexual abuse by a doctor and her father while undergoing psychotherapy, abandoning her career to set up the original Adults Surviving Child Abuse organisation. ASCA was riven by infighting at the time, centred around Mullinar’s counselling practices and belief in satanic abuse cults. Kezelman joined as a director in late 2002 and became chairperson two years later, by which time Mullinar had left to run Mayumarri separately.
...
www.bishop-accountability.org/news5/2017...att_Those_Events.htm
...
There are other organisations that have been the subject of complaint that CIFS [judging from a Google search, this stands for Cult Information and Family Support] are aware of.

For example, Liz Mullinar is the founder of the ‘Heal for Life’ and Mayumarri centres, and who believes that women suffering from mental illness have suppressed the memories of ritual satanic abuse and advocates a range of therapies for which she holds no qualification and which have no clinical basis 11 . This organisation enjoys the concessional status of a charity. She has been the subject of numerous complaints to the HCCC and elsewhere 12 . A former Director of the centre has resigned and has referred the centre to the Royal Commission into institutional responses to child sexual abuse because “because of the consistency of complaints about it over the years, and the inability or failure of regulators to address them.” 13 Concerns include inadequate training of volunteer carers and routine self-harm at the centre. As a story in the Australian stated “Mullinar and her volunteer staff have no medical qualifications, so they work outside the jurisdiction of medical boards and healthcare regulators. It's an issue causing increasing concern as alternative healers proliferate and religious organisations snare an increasing share of government welfare money.” CIFS asks what action has been taken since this story to prevent further harm from occurring?
...
www.dss.gov.au/sites/default/files/docum...d_family_support.pdf

Liz Muliner that's it!

www.abc.net.au/news/2013-11-26/child-abu...-inadequate/5115834.

"Former carers claim child abuse retreat beset by poor training, self-harm and cult allegations"

This seems to be the working link for that article:
www.abc.net.au/news/2013-11-26/child-abu...e-inadequate/5115834

It sounds a very weird outfit. I wonder if, unlike the people in the article, Sarah Monahan was able to gush about Heal for Life in her blog ("Heal For Life was the most amazing thing I have ever done for myself.") because she hadn't actually been abused and was just acting a part in order to bolster her story.

I highly recommend watching Schofield on the island. I laughed my head off.

What a very weird programme this Castaway with Schofield is. Nothing more than an excuse to give him a platform to act out a self pitying whingefest and generate sympathy for him. Quite a pathetic performance. Shame on Channel 5 for going there with this. Shame on me for watching some of it.

Simon wrote:
What a very weird programme this Castaway with Schofield is. Nothing more than an excuse to give him a platform to act out a self pitying whingefest and generate sympathy for him. Quite a pathetic performance. Shame on Channel 5 for going there with this. Shame on me for watching some of it.

I am amazed that Channel 5 still got ad revenue. Why is everyone in the media a twat?

Simon wrote:
What a very weird programme this Castaway with Schofield is. Nothing more than an excuse to give him a platform to act out a self pitying whingefest and generate sympathy for him. Quite a pathetic performance. Shame on Channel 5 for going there with this. Shame on me for watching some of it.

a bit tough.. Schofield did nothing illegal and did not deserve the rotten media treatment and hysteria.

I also reject the notion that he somehow did something unethical.

It is absolutely normal for 2 people in an industry to have a legal affair..the age discrepancy is just rubbish otherwise why isn't the world and the media up in arms about Rupert Murdoch and the disparity of ages with his last 3 wives?

I think of my father's parents also..grandfather ran a factory and married a girl from the shop floor 10 years his junior. My father was born 3 months later and they remained devoted to each other.

Common normal acts the world over for 1000s of years.