cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Go to bottomPost New TopicPost Reply
TOPIC: Labour thug
#250355
Green Man

Re:Labour thug 1 Month, 2 Weeks ago  
Wyot wrote:
[quote]Green Man wrote:
Chris wrote:


Punching a bloke in the street, Starmer will suspend him and hope it gets swept under the rug or he uses a distaction like the Budget. An average bloke would be in the docks and be sent to prison.


I thought Prescott's punch all those years ago was superior - he knew what he was doing! Better times....


Another fat, sleezeball. However he was provoked, Mike Amesbury threw and landed the first punch and carried on, whilst the guy was on the ground.
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
#250358
hedda

Re:Labour thug 1 Month, 2 Weeks ago  
Wyot wrote:
[quote]Green Man wrote:
Chris wrote:


Punching a bloke in the street, Starmer will suspend him and hope it gets swept under the rug or he uses a distaction like the Budget. An average bloke would be in the docks and be sent to prison.


I thought Prescott's punch all those years ago was superior - he knew what he was doing! Better times....


Indeed the "Prescot Punch was a beauty and seemed to have endeared him to the people.

This current events must surely mean the attacker will do jail time.
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
#250374
Wyot

Re:Labour thug 1 Month, 2 Weeks ago  
Prescott's punch was superior precisely because it was a functional piece of retaliation, deftly delivered by a man who got things done.

Amesbury's assault was excessive, clumsy and bordering on masturbatory. This, I think, is a fair comparison between their respective Governments so far...
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
#250386
Green Man

Re:Labour thug 1 Month, 2 Weeks ago  
Wyot wrote:
Prescott's punch was superior precisely because it was a functional piece of retaliation, deftly delivered by a man who got things done.

Amesbury's assault was excessive, clumsy and bordering on masturbatory. This, I think, is a fair comparison between their respective Governments so far...



I have no problem of sticking up to themselves like Two Jags did but Mike Amesbury is a vile hooligan.
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
Go to topPost New TopicPost Reply