IMPORTANT NOTE: You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.
|
Home Forums |
TOPIC: We were once on Mars
|
|
Re:We were once on Mars 15 Years, 11 Months ago
|
|
veritas wrote:
<snip>
But scientists are absolutely annoying people. He agrees that in the infinity of space the chances of a similar solar system to ours must exist-possibly thousands of them but so far away we could never get near them , and with all the identical systems to support life. But he doesn't believe in UFOs.
I don't understand what you think is wrong or annoying about this position?
I am assuming you are using UFO to mean aliens from outer space if you are your friend stance seems perfect sensible to me.
Mart wrote:
I think that UFO`s have to believed in as there must be a lot of things that fly about which nobody knows what they are!
What if anything is in them, who could say.
I saw one once, I`m not claiming any green men of course, but quite simply nobody who saw the thing could offer an explanation for it, so that makes it a UFO in any book.
Indeed if identified it wouldn't be a UFO by definition.
(PS Sorry not to have tipped your CD yet ... I'll get to it soon, been a bit busy)
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Re:We were once on Mars 15 Years, 11 Months ago
|
|
K wrote:
zooloo wrote:
Do you have a reference for your first point and the 100s of witnesses and video footage please.LOL, what did your last slave die of?! Details are out there, go find them.
Shall I take that as "No I don't have a reference for my assertion"?
Anyway given the huge proliferation of cameras one would expect a mountain of convincing material by now if the claims had substance - there isn't because they do not QED.
zooloo wrote:
Somebody claiming to be from the future with no evidence would, quite rightly, be scoffed at. To suppose that if they had reliable evidence they'd still be scoffed at is a nonsense.And that evidence would be in the form of?
What comes to my mind is if I were able to travel back to Victorian times - my clothing would be an obvious anomaly in style and manufacture. Other things like my battery powered watch, my cigarette lighter and such would certainly lend credence to my claim.
Perhaps I could "predict" the winners of the Derby or have a copy of next week's Times. It wouldn't be direct proof but would again lend credence to my claim
Perhaps the best way would be to demonstrate my time-machine in action.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|