cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Enter what you see:
This image contains a scrambled text, it is using a combination of colors, font size, background, angle in order to disallow computer to automate reading. You will have to reproduce it to post on my homepage Tip: Reload page if you have difficulty reading characters
Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Go to bottomPost New TopicPost Reply
TOPIC: Adam Johnson Appeal verdict
#159867
Adam Johnson Appeal verdict 6 Months, 1 Week ago Karma: 49
I'm sure he anticipated it would be rejected; it almost always is. Judges don't like contradicting each other. That's why I didn't even bother to attend my appeal hearing in 2003. If I had I might have realised that I not only knew the lead judge (there are always 3 for appeals) but had even had sex with him when we were at Cambridge University together in 1964. Judges tend not to mention these things to their fellows. It might cast doubt on their integrity (especially as, in 1964, that sort of behaviour was a crime).

But there is something very wrong with the system. I notice that one of the Judges on the Johnson appeal was Sweeney, the QC at my appeal. What a strange world.
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
Go to topPost New TopicPost Reply