IMPORTANT NOTE: You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.
|
Home Forums |
TOPIC: Christine Keeler
|
|
Re:Christine Keeler 6 Years, 4 Months ago
|
|
JK2006 wrote:
I'm not sure I'd consider being compared to a prostitute would strike me as an insult; in fact I'd definitely consider it a compliment if he/she was a gorgeous as Christine was! Wasn't Alain Delon once a rent boy? And there were rumours about Tony Curtis. In my life I've done far worse than prostitution and, indeed, have not only sold my body but my soul to millions in my 73 years.
Oh I fully agree. Now. But not in 1974.
Selling what belongs to you is far better morally in my eyes that shoplifting or fraud, which nobody seems to mind much.
Another odd thing about prostitution I dont understand is, If you coerce or blackmail someone into having sex with you it is rape.
(legally)
This includes physical threats, and threats to withdraw money or affection.
So how come if a prostitute does it because they are being trafficked or have no money to feed their children, or are addicted to drugs etc which takes away their choice, are they not being raped?
Why dont they get the same protection as everyone else?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Re:Christine Keeler 6 Years, 4 Months ago
|
|
In The Know wrote:
honey!oh sugar sugar. wrote:
Why dont they get the same protection as everyone else?
They do - but once you say "yes" or agree a price, it cannot be rape, can it?
(you have consented - for the money)
I am not sure, ITK. I thought the same as you, but Section 74 defines consent as "if she agrees by choice, and has the freedom and capacity to make that choice" .
Some prostitutes dont have the freedom and capacity to make the choice, and the clients know it, so in this case, is it rape?
Bearing in mind that those assisting a rape are also charged with rape..
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Re:Christine Keeler 6 Years, 4 Months ago
|
|
honey!oh sugar sugar. wrote:
In The Know wrote:
honey!oh sugar sugar. wrote:
Why dont they get the same protection as everyone else?
They do - but once you say "yes" or agree a price, it cannot be rape, can it?
(you have consented - for the money)
I am not sure, ITK. I thought the same as you, but Section 74 defines consent as "if she agrees by choice, and has the freedom and capacity to make that choice" .
Some prostitutes dont have the freedom and capacity to make the choice, and the clients know it, so in this case, is it rape?
Bearing in mind that those assisting a rape are also charged with rape..
Well, it is fact a crime to have sex with a prostitute who has been trafficked (even if you didn't know), which seems crazy. If you are going to go down that road, then you could argue that if you give money to a young homeless person, you could be charged with funding drug use, as it is usually the case that that they want the money to fund their next hit (watch druglands on bbc iplayer), or if you get your nails done at the local nail bar, then you are encouraging trafficking (Many are trafficked to work at these places). Apart from those trafficked, there is always another option to prostitution (like getting a job), however they choose prostitution because it is quick and easy money, you can't go blaming the customer.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Re:Christine Keeler 6 Years, 4 Months ago
|
|
robbiex wrote:
honey!oh sugar sugar. wrote:
In The Know wrote:
honey!oh sugar sugar. wrote:
Why dont they get the same protection as everyone else?
They do - but once you say "yes" or agree a price, it cannot be rape, can it?
(you have consented - for the money)
I am not sure, ITK. I thought the same as you, but Section 74 defines consent as "if she agrees by choice, and has the freedom and capacity to make that choice" .
Some prostitutes dont have the freedom and capacity to make the choice, and the clients know it, so in this case, is it rape?
Bearing in mind that those assisting a rape are also charged with rape..
Well, it is fact a crime to have sex with a prostitute who has been trafficked (even if you didn't know), which seems crazy. If you are going to go down that road, then you could argue that if you give money to a young homeless person, you could be charged with funding drug use, as it is usually the case that that they want the money to fund their next hit (watch druglands on bbc iplayer), or if you get your nails done at the local nail bar, then you are encouraging trafficking (Many are trafficked to work at these places). Apart from those trafficked, there is always another option to prostitution (like getting a job), however they choose prostitution because it is quick and easy money, you can't go blaming the customer.
You cant get a job if you are wanted by the police, or if you want to hide, and if you cant find a job.
I am sure there are plenty who choose it as a career and good luck to them, but the ones I come across are often forced into it by circumstance.
I didnt know about the nail bars, Robbie. I dont think I have ever even been in one, so thank you for recommending Druglands. It looks really good.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|