I have no idea who wrote these two part MWT articles - rumours reach me that The Secret Barrister is involved. But it is fantastically accurate.

trollexposure.wordpress.com/2019/04/16/i...rmind-or-masterfool/

trollexposure.wordpress.com/2019/04/16/i...-masterfool-part-ii/

trollexposure.wordpress.com/

Most interesting. I see that MWT is back on Twitter.

This seems to support the suspicions expressed in those blogs.

"One interesting fact that struck me was that Mark Williams-Thomas claims to have had a “list” of paedophiles back when he was still a policeman in 2000.

“It wasn’t just King. I had a list of people in the music industry that were abusing kids.
Some were prosecuted, some were not.”"
Ths same article is quoted more extensively in a comment here by Margaret Jervis, with a link to the original source:
barthsnotes.com/2018/08/11/mark-williams...rom-selling-details/

She concludes her post:

"Suspect there is much more to be found out. In particular, if MWT did take the second statement [from a JK accuser] having knowledge of the first – was there contamination.?"

JK2006 wrote:
I have no idea who wrote these two part MWT articles - rumours reach me that The Secret Barrister is involved.
Looks as if that may not be the case, unless the blogger is being deliberately misleading:

"Matthew Scott, a well respected criminal barrister and highly respected author on the subject of false allegations, has rightly (in my view) expressed concern at this Court of Appeal judgement. As a layman, I don’t profess to understand everything about the law, but I can see when things are not right with specific cases and this one isn’t right."
trollexposure.wordpress.com/2019/04/04/w-t-a-f/

Bartholomew's Notes has now picked up the same here.
Williams-Thomas left Surrey Police in October 2001 – just weeks before the News of the World revealed the existence of the “700-page report”. It ought to have been obvious to them that this leak was the work of Mark Williams-Thomas – so why was no action taken against him?

I don;t think Secret Barrister is involved as I'm sure I read on one post that the author may have faced false charges at some stage.

But's it's well written and very informative.

You're correct Hedda and Jo; I have since discovered the author and it was not The Secret Barrister (whose book is a MUST read by the way). However this blog has inspired an avalanche of activity - do read THIS...

barthsnotes.com/2019/04/17/2001-the-news...ons/#comment-2013112

Meanwhile, MWT's Twitter account has been re-opened; the man clearly feels he is untouchable despite enormous interest from various serious crime investigations and media attention. It must be suspected that cronies - perhaps more junior in 2000 - are now in senior police positions and are keen to avoid scrutiny of past behaviour. To put it simply; he knows where many bodies are buried (even if he appears incapable of unearthing perpetrators). Unfortunately for MWT - so do we.

It may be unjustified and, I stress, is only suspicion but I wonder whether retired Surrey cop Brian Marjoram is quaking in his boots after the Manhunt excellent ITV show. If I'd been him I'd have been horrified by the implications in the TV series. What implications? News of the World? Leaks? Mark Williams Thomas?

And if my suspicions are accurate, I bet Marjoram complained to ITV about these hints. And, if he did, I bet ITV would have finally dumped MWT - no matter what other pressure the public company came under. We shall only be able to guess the truth if, all of a sudden, MWT crops up elsewhere (such as in a minor role in a Ch4 series) in 2019. Or suddenly decides to "change" his Agency over to a firm less disturbed by potential future links. Or suddenly "decides" to suggest to his publishers that they might be wiser NOT putting out his book. Or finds himself having to answer serious charges about a Malaysian death. Or shuts down his Twitter account - again.

Meanwhile, in a totally unconnected event, the CCRC are investigating which ex Surrey Police officer tried to get £5000 each (total £25,000) for the False Accusers in 2001 who - he claimed - would each miraculously refuse to give evidence at my trial in September that year. It appears that ex Surrey Police officer tried (and failed) to get information from his ex colleagues - something which emerged during the "debacle" of my 2018 trial (amazing how much fresh evidence can be revealed when demanded by a decent Judge). But somehow he DID find all the names and contact details which, it appears, he then offered for sale to the National Tabloid Editors.

Oh what a tangled web we weave when first we practice to deceive.

Thank you all for your very kind comments regarding the articles on trollexposure.

There were additional articles to those posted by JK which filled in some more holes and also strengthened some of the initial theories in the first article in that series.


This link is highlighted in the most recent of those articles: web.archive.org/web/20121203161911/http:...ark-williams-thomas/
It raises some more concerns about that NotW 2001 list and it's real source. It also raises questions about who the "woman in the media" was who initially introduced MWT to the concept of JK's alleged offending. Could it be that the "woman in the media" was Rebekah Brooks or indeed someone like Shy Keenan?

Ah no TE - you have to remember I have access to loads of information - much of which I either cannot share (unused during my recent debacle) or choose to keep to myself for the moment. The woman was neither of those and has recently deceased but left a great deal of information behind which we (and crucial others) now possess.

Thanks JK. It was just a thought re Brooks because of the previous connection in NotW. Thank you for the promotions too on your Twitter feed.

If I may also take the opportunity to make a shameless plug, and in promotional parlance here's my latest "album" (!)

For those who haven't already read it (and apologies if you have), that latest article is about the ruling made by the judge, Justice Deborah Taylor, regarding JK's 2018 acquittal and the issues that surrounded that acquittal. The ruling document is damning of serial failures by Surrey Police in particular, it also raises some additional questions in my view regarding MWT's involvement with Operation Yewtree which were not part of the explicit ruling but should be considered by both the Met and Surrey Police in the aftermath of the ruling.

trollexposure wrote:
Thank you all for your very kind comments regarding the articles on trollexposure.

There were additional articles to those posted by JK which filled in some more holes and also strengthened some of the initial theories in the first article in that series.


This link is highlighted in the most recent of those articles: web.archive.org/web/20121203161911/http:...ark-williams-thomas/
It raises some more concerns about that NotW 2001 list and it's real source. It also raises questions about who the "woman in the media" was who initially introduced MWT to the concept of JK's alleged offending. Could it be that the "woman in the media" was Rebekah Brooks or indeed someone like Shy Keenan?

I must say you are doing some great forensic stuff there.

Time and events move quickly (I bet MWT is pleased about that) and it's difficult at times, to get into the nitty gritty of events such as the King judgement. It helps to read a full judgement but many of us don't have the time or inclination to.

So it's always good when someone else can do this and highlight important facts as you have done.

And this is fascinating...

rabbitaway.blogspot.com/2019/04/operatio...williams-thomas.html

Well worth keeping up as this develops.