"The reason why she initially gave false statements was because she realised that she was being recorded while she was having sexual intercourse and so she was placed in a difficult position and felt embarrassed.
"She then apologised saying she had made a mistake by filing a false statement."
He said the woman "did not make a good impression, she did not tell the truth, and tried to mislead the court" during her evidence.
"There was no rape, or violence, and police had carried out a thorough investigation making all necessary arrests," the judge added.


I really cannot see how this can be rejected by observers. Please explain why she cannot now be considered a False Accuser.

JK2006 wrote:
"The reason why she initially gave false statements was because she realised that she was being recorded while she was having sexual intercourse and so she was placed in a difficult position and felt embarrassed.
"She then apologised saying she had made a mistake by filing a false statement."
He said the woman "did not make a good impression, she did not tell the truth, and tried to mislead the court" during her evidence.
"There was no rape, or violence, and police had carried out a thorough investigation making all necessary arrests," the judge added.


I really cannot see how this can be rejected by observers. Please explain why she cannot now be considered a False Accuser.


You should of watched last night's Press Preview with Yasmin Brown-Alibhai. She says there's evidence of Ayia being raped etc. However I haven't seen or read anything that goes with narrative. Hedda could you please give me some links ?