cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Enter what you see:
This image contains a scrambled text, it is using a combination of colors, font size, background, angle in order to disallow computer to automate reading. You will have to reproduce it to post on my homepage Tip: Reload page if you have difficulty reading characters
Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Go to bottomPost New TopicPost Reply
TOPIC: Jeremy Bamber
#194863
Jeremy Bamber 2 Months, 2 Weeks ago  
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
#194867
Bookworm

Re:Jeremy Bamber 2 Months, 2 Weeks ago  
An interesting case and probably ( like Barry George's) one of the most horrific in terms of not only the nature of the crime, but the lack of real incriminating evidence.
This conviction was built on a foundation of media intrusion in conjunction with an apparent scorned girlfriend and a family with a dislike of Jeremy and a penchant for wealth.

More worryingly is the reluctance to see it as it is.

I watched the original Drama on it recently.

There are fears the new one will put elements of suspicion against Jeremy in the new drama series.
When any media has a hand in trying to stitch somebody up and then airing programs which are supposed to be honest, it is a huge cause for concern in terms of honesty.

I don't trust the MSM for reasons like this. Who writes these programs and whose side are they on and whose money do they take?

It's like the phone hacking scandal. None of the bastards in media spoke out when 3 people died in Paris 1997.
Yet how many knew?

If that's not evil, I don't know what is.
You won't see the usual public justice workers who enjoy their own presence on social media will be shouting about that.

It's the same old bollocks. Silence from the guilty?
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
#194869
Barney

Re:Jeremy Bamber 2 Months, 2 Weeks ago  
Having assumed that Sheila was the culprit - and the case was open and shut - the police destroyed evidence and records, and even helped to clean up the farmhouse.

And a lot of their own data about important phone calls (between Bamber and his father, for instance) weren't available at the trial - but later turned up. Times of calls were critical, but non-existent for years!

In addition, the main evidence came from a disgruntled ex-girlfriend - who supported Bamber before he ended their relationship, but changed her evidence subsequently.

I've no idea whether Bamber is innocent or not; but the case was so badly investigated by Essex police - that another look is clearly warranted, with new technology and forensic methods involved.


 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
#194870
Barney

Re:Jeremy Bamber 2 Months, 2 Weeks ago  
Ownership of blood on the gun's silencer was - the lab later reported - inconclusive, and could have been that of someone else; instead of Bamber or his sister.

At the trial, it was said to be Bamber's - and numerous other anomalies exist - all made worse and badly contaminated by the police cleaning up the farmhouse.

Then police records of the phone calls - putting Bamber at a definite location - at the time of the murders, only came to light last year.

Meaning simply - if Bamber was on a call at C, it would (because of distance) be impossible for him to commit the murders at D!

Several police officers were quickly transferred, retired or vanished - after these terrible events.


 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
#194873
Re:Jeremy Bamber 2 Months, 2 Weeks ago  
White House Farm - I'm finding it incredibly hard to understand the dialogue; this happens a lot; worse with ITV than BBC and the commercials are as clear as bells (unfortunately; don't want to hear a word of the crap). Is it me going deafer and deafer or do others find it similar? I'd think it was me if it wasn't for the commercials being crystal clear; I can hear every pointless word.
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
#194875
Re:Jeremy Bamber 2 Months, 2 Weeks ago  
I'd forgotten what a dreadful crime it was; the only conclusion has to be that only a lunatic could do something like that and it does seem that Bambi was bonkers. But we're only 45 mins in.
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
#194876
Re:Jeremy Bamber 2 Months, 2 Weeks ago  
And is it just me or do many of these documents-dramas have an ongoing rumble effect or music underneath the whole thing; trying to create doom but instead making dialogue impossible to hear?
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
#194877
Barney

Re:Jeremy Bamber 2 Months, 2 Weeks ago  
The salient and significant factor here is police incompetence.

A highly unusual and complex case was inherited by officers with little or no experience.

Bodies everywhere (all a family/25 shots), and an overriding desire to have it all wrapped up quickly.

Essex police wanted to rival the Met on competence - ignoring details, and failing to make logical decisions.


CSI (an American series, showing how forensic analysis should be carried out) would have come up with a very different outcome.

Blood spatter and timeline factors would have been paramount.

Guilty or not - Bamber's case was handled extremely badly.


Most will agree with that, at least, when the series concludes.

Officers concerned will be incomunacdo - as they were soon after the horrendous events....



 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
Go to topPost New TopicPost Reply