IMPORTANT NOTE: You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.
|
Home Forums |
TOPIC: You will be believed
|
|
Re:You will be believed 3 Years, 8 Months ago
|
|
"You will be believed" sounds like a silly unimportant point. Of course police must believe someone coming to them on ANY topic from Murder to suspected terrorism to fraud and burglary and yes sex crimes. And of course they must investigate unless they are fairly quickly certain the accuser is mad, deluded, mistaken, after revenge or child custody or divorce or hard cash.
But the investigation then must be honest. Not with an agenda. Because if it has an agenda, police become complicit in that crime.
Example; planting evidence to prove a murder DID take place. Planting drugs to help prove dealing in drugs. Planting money to prove "laundering". Assisting false accusers with details even if only "off camera" by raising eyebrows, playing with a tie, winking.
Then "you will be believed" becomes "even if you are lying for your own reasons especially if it helps us get convictions, promotion, raised budgets, media attention".
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Re:You will be believed 3 Years, 8 Months ago
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Re:You will be believed 3 Years, 8 Months ago
|
|
JK2006 wrote:
Likewise - now - Ghislaine Maxwell if she filed (as she must do) a counter claim against the Giuffre woman. Police must then "believe" and investigate Giuffre's motives and past behaviour. Simultaneously.
I understand that the three accusers on the basis of whose allegations she's now charged don't include Giuffre and that she settled with Giuffre when Giuffre sued her for defamation in a 2016 civil case.
But it looks as if Giuffre is suing for defamation her again, which I don't understand.
11 August 2020: Ghislaine Maxwell’s claim of ‘critical new information’ just a stall tactic, accuser says
Ghislaine Maxwell’s claim that “critical new information” could impact her criminal and civil court cases is simply a stall tactic that should not delay the unsealing of secret court documents, one of her alleged victims argued in a letter filed Tuesday.
Virginia Giuffre, who is suing the alleged madam for defamation in Manhattan federal court, said Maxwell’s claim “illustrates her disregard for the Court’s time, as well as her willingness to engage in dilatory conduct to thwart the unsealing process,” according to the court papers.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|