Our former PM has been very very careful NOT to get caught out with this issue ... he claims not to know anything (which is certainly incompetence to allow our troops to break the Geneva Convention without knowing what they were doing !)

Hear the man himself LIE ! http://www.blairwatch.co.uk/down/blairrend.mp3

then read all about his evasion on the subject -

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/5055544.stm

Have you found enough people to fill a Jury yet - that would believe that B-Liar was innocent ?

The jury would base their verdict on evidence of the issue in hand. Not based on past convictions.

You are still missing the real story because of your pre-conceived prejudice.

What is your evidence Blair was lying on this occasion?

zooloo wrote:

Where is your evidence Blair was lying on this occasion?

B-Liar is using "The Nuremburg Defence" (it wasn't me, gov - I didn't know anything about it - honest !) ... it didn't work for them - and it shouldn't work for him.

He either LIED on the first occasion (by denying knowing of the existence of, and our co-operation with the CIA secret prisons and their inherent torture and abuse) OR he was completely incompentent (and culpable - by not checking) by allowing UK troops to become War Criminals by co-operating with these prisons (which he knew nothing about !)

So ...
do we CONVICT for KNOWING ... or CONVICT for NOT KNOWING ?

btw - you STILL haven't found 12 people who would find him innocent, have you??!!!

You keep shifting your terms of reference and going off at tangents.

The question is quite simple - do you have evidence that Blair was lying on this occasion - Yes or No?

BTW you have the Nuremberg Defence incorrect. (Which by your own measure this is the third proof you are lying)

Yep - guilty as hell !

This is what is called plausible deniability. The UK government has been operating a policy of "see no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil".

but .... GUILTY AS HELL !

In The Know wrote:
Yep - guilty as hell !

This is what is called plausible deniability. The UK government has been operating a policy of "see no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil".

but .... GUILTY AS HELL !
The question is quite simple - do you have evidence that Blair was lying on this occasion - Yes or No?

OK that's quite enough on this thread which I now declare closed!