This story won't go away, will it?
---

On September 11 2001, the World Trade Centre collapsed after a devastating terrorist attack. However, a third 47-storey building, apparently untouched by the hijacked aeroplanes was also levelled, seven hours after the twin towers. This programme investigates the circumstances that caused this seemingly unscathed structure to fall, and questions whether a sinister plot was hatched to destroy it.

Brilliant programme. Is that the last in the series? Knowing my luck..

The programme itself was awful. It seemed to be trying to PUSH an agenda and do a cover up - which was bizarre because all the evidence they presented actually pointed towards TOWER 7 being brought down by a PRE-ARRANGED demolition.

1. Eye witness claimed explosions and was interviewed saying there were loads of dead bodies in the building.....later he changed his mind. Sadly for him his interview was on tape LOL yet the BBC did not follow this up or even ask him WHY he was lying.

2. The Fire Service claimed all water was cut to the area when the 2 towers came down.....then the programme later showed footage of TOWER 7 with a couple of firemen using WATER FROM A HYDRANT clearly working to clean up !!!!

3. The Controlled Demolition theory is supported by 380 architects !!! yet only one was interviewed.....and the "Official" who says it was not a Controlled Demolition was the BUSH own demolition man !!! He also rubbishes one view that a new type of explosive had been used by saying that it would be impossible to bring the whole building down at once that way - yet that is what actually happened ( It is very hard to lie when the facts contradict what you are saying )

For what it is worth - this is my conclusion after watching this programme based on the evidence that the BBC uncovered :

1. The tower was intentionally destroyed to hide paperwork ( possibly to do with fraud investigations into what we now are seeing - the credit crunch - Enron etc )

2. 9/11 was a REAL terrrorist attack ( Sorry conspiracy theorists ) which the USA knew about and let happen for two reasons :

a) To create the conditions for a war v Iraq for oil and
b) To hide corporate fraud in the USA which was out of control

Whether this was done at the highest level or just by some "agencies" we will never know. But how JET AIRLINERS could do this without interception - and how buildings could collapse so quickly - is a big problem which the authorities have yet to explain away.......

It is on I PLAYER - have a look for the inconsistencoies yourself - they are many

I shall watch it this morning and give my thoughts.
My outside impression at the moment is that these are all old internet conspiracy theories and no new thoughts will be added.

I'm surprised anyone is still spouting this conspiracy stuff. I guess it'll last as long as the JFK incident. I'm sure most people went for either the tennis final or Midsomer Murders.

Be careful not to ask too many questions ... otherwise you could find yourself "rendered" !

Ok.
Watched it, nothing I have not heard before.

As some of you know, that day still depresses the hell out of me.
All that has been done, is put the internet ideas onto the TV about it as suspected.

No interest here in the programme, it is blocked from my frontal lobe.

JET LINERS had no chance of interception as they had there transponders switched off. This was well documented.

Do you actually believe that radar only shows up "transponders" ?

This would mean that as long as a terrorist turned off a transponder then they could fly where they want when they want LOL which is not true.

A transponder only gives out the plane code. The plane is still visible and on radar when the hijack took place the air traffic control can trace back the plane to where the transponder was turned off in order to get a fix. It only disappears off the radar once the plane either explodes or goes under the height of the radar.

I hope that puts to bed another myth which you have taken on board from the misinformation which is spread around to explain WHY the USA did not shoot down these planes.

The actual planes scrambled went OUT TO SEA to meet the threat !! Which is even funnier when they knew it was a threat from an internal flight hijack LOL

Can you explain that ( I know it is because the traditional view was that a threat to the USA would come from "outside" but in this case the planes were scrambled to intercept the hijacked planes - yet this was an internal flight(s)

Still more questions to be answered - and yes I agree that we have been bombarded by appalling images from 9/11 - and it has been done to death by the media ( In order to brainwash us I believe into switching off - otherwise why do it !! ) but I think that now we are 7 years on from it then we need to look at what happened with the benefit of hindsight and the evidence which has come out. History takes time to "settle" and this is what is happening - dont knock it - it is worth watching on I PLAYER.

What is most interesting is the one side ( official version ) say everything they say is 100% true without any evidence necessarily for this ) yet the other side are really only saying that the truth as presented is not 100% true and so are asking for it to be looked into. If the OFFICIAL version has "NOTHING TO HIDE" then why are they so admamant and so against investigation and seem to have covered up the steel of this building etc.

I still think the very idea that untrained (or only partially trained) people could hijack airliners and fly them perfectly to their destinations is quite absurd !

Didn't the BBC report that WTC7 had collapsed, when it was still standing behind the reporter telling us this 25 minutes before?

Did you see the programme?? Obviously not!

Yes, they did...