news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7835149.stm

Watch this and you think you are watching two people "caught on camera" as the Police have said.

BUT WATCH IT AGAIN !!!

1. The first camera clearly FOLLOWS the two of them in the ticket office. Yes it is centring them AND is zooming in on them. There are LOADS of other people around and they dont look suspicious in any way......

2. The Second camera clearly FOLLOWS Them along the train platform - again centring and again zooming.

3. Finally when the train doors open - the camera FOLLOWS the two of them INTO The carriage.

Consider this :

The girl was not reported missing when these CCTV camera pictures were taken - so WHY ? were they following two seemingly non suspicious people......

Therefore we have to ask questions like :

1. Why did the CCTV operators follow them and why were they not stopped if they deemed worth of such attention.

2. Did the authorities COLLUDE with the two of them in order to get a MEDIA STORY ( which the media are milking )

3. Was the man under surveillance ( he has now been announced ON BAIL via SUSSEX POLICE ( our favourite POLICE STATE Police Force - if you have been following the posts on here )


Something about this whole situation does not sit right - watch the video again. I am sure that you will then feel the same about it.

So far the MEDIA have totally ignored this EXCLUSIVE view of the CCTV footage. But it actually must mean something.

The centering and zooming is retropspective. Carried out by appropriate software to enhance images. Not as suspicious as some may presume.

Sorry you are totally wrong.

You cant retrospectively FOLLOW them.

The camera actually moves WITH THEM.

Latest Twist :

CCTV footage is now found of them on a Cross Channel Ferry........

But the footage has not been put up - because I would imagine it FOLLOWS them as well.

You cant retrospectively FOLLOW with a camera - you can enlarge - you can even zoom - but you cant change camera position because it has already happened.

The plot thickens.

Despite being filmed constantly this "couple" are evading the Police - the media etc.

This smacks of a set up like the KAREN WILLIAMS case in my view........but the Police and CCTV operators seem to be in on it.

Perhaps they are allowing them to reach another country so that the man's offence can be considered even more serious.

I'm not sure quite how it works, but I suspect that taking her out of the UK might be more serious than remaining here.

BR wrote:
Sorry you are totally wrong.

You cant retrospectively FOLLOW them.

The camera actually moves WITH THEM.

Latest Twist :

CCTV footage is now found of them on a Cross Channel Ferry........

But the footage has not been put up - because I would imagine it FOLLOWS them as well.

You cant retrospectively FOLLOW with a camera - you can enlarge - you can even zoom - but you cant change camera position because it has already happened.

The plot thickens.

Despite being filmed constantly this "couple" are evading the Police - the media etc.

This smacks of a set up like the KAREN WILLIAMS case in my view........but the Police and CCTV operators seem to be in on it.

Are you an expert in the field of CCTV image capturing? You seem to think you are. The way in which data captured images can be manipulated may surprise you BR. Your comment in fact indicative of many of your postings in that you are good at raising points but not at listening to other opinions withojt any prior knowledge.

Angel - consider this.

Latest news on the Daily Mail site.

The Police WERE following him when he hooked up with a 16 year old in Brighton and they arrested him in a hotel room he had booked with the 16 year old.

At the same time he was in contact with this girl - so the Police certainly would have known about this particular girl. I also believe the Police have colluded to allow them to "abscond" to make this story ( complete with photos and CCTV ) to make the public think they are "doing something" about dangers on the internet.

The Father of the other girl is having a go at The Police for letting this bloke go - the Police had "lost" him according to them. The truth looks as if the Police had been "setting him up" with this second girl in order to get a "great story"

I think the whole thing smells very bad. I do feel sorry for the 15 year old girl - but if she had been seeing this bloke for 6 months why had her family not noticed.

In addition the photos seem to show a VERY FAT girl with a man of over 60 years old ( He looks far older than Glitter ) very very very very weird.

It will be interesting how this all ends. They will be caught - but then there will probably be silence about the story.

within 18 hours of publishing this thread the girl has now been found in Lille - safe and well.

Looks as if the Police decided that continuing a "false" chase any longer may raise more eyebrows considering the information released in the public domain last night.

As I said before - this one is likely to disappear off the media wires very quickly now because they have been rumbled.

From what I understand the girl and man turned themselves in. I very much doubt that this thread had any influence on proceedings.

Not in itself - but the Daily Mail article may have that I based the thread on.

Why would someone supposedly on the "run" hand themselves in ? Does not make any sense at all. Why bother in the first place.

Still cant see much happening - except it has been a great story for the "anti internet" lobby who want to monitor every person's e mails.

A set up situation.

I once researched runaways for a script I was writing.

Here are some up to date FACTS about such things :

www.missingpeople.org.uk/uploads/files/s...ics_and_research.pdf

Once you read that through you have to ask yourself WHY was this particular girl part of a MEDIA campaign and the other thousands ( many younger ) are not.

You also have to ask HOW the person she was with was ALREADY ON POLICE BAIL and known to them.

You then need to look at the CCTV footage and realise that they were being followed and allowed to leave the UK by the authorities.

The whole situation seems to have been fabricated in some way. It does not ring true.

I don't totally go along with your conspiracy theory BR but I do agree there's something very odd about this.

All meejah reports say they "turned themselves in" to the consulate in Lille yet the local up north DCI Littledick is saying they had a "tip off" they were in Lille.

None of it really adds up.

And funny to think if she was a few weeks older it would all be perfectly legal.

well maybe they heard that someone had tipped the police off?

quite possible- don't think there's anything fishy about this really.

another FISHY turn of events.

The girl is now not being re-united with her family or returned to her home.

Very very very very strange.

This is a non story which the Police seem to be manipulating for maximum headlines.

Every week at least 10 girls of this age run off with their often over age boyfriends - with no fuss. In many cases the Police totally ignore the family who report them missing. ( see the report for the actual scale of what is happening )

Maybe this bloke has been told he gets "time off" for his other misdemeanor if he "pulled a stunt" which then the Police could "spin" onto the media.

I believe this is not a straightforward runaway and every day seems to back up that fact.

If we find out that nothing happened between the Fat runaway and the old geezer then it adds even more fuel to a conspiracy theory on this.......

And of course the age of consent in France is 15...

And the mother looks like she's been inflated with the Karen Matthews reverse vacuum Tesco budget machine.

BR why is it strange that she is being reunited with her mother? nothing fishy in that.

I would be willing to admit there was something fishy if someone presented real evidence.

Yes,the age of consent in France is 15, but the main issue is that the girl disappeared, without letting her parents know. How many parents would contact the police if their daughter disappeared? Most, I think.